期刊文献+

HR-HPV对CIN冷刀锥切后的随访价值 被引量:11

High-risk Human Papilloma Virus Testing for Monitoring Patients with High-grade Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia after Cold-Knife Conization
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨HR-HPV监测CIN冷刀锥切后病变残余或复发的价值。方法:118例冷刀锥切后患者第3、6、12、18、24个月均检测HR-HPV和细胞学及阴道镜,病理证实存在CIN视为残留或复发。结果:术后病理切缘阳性10例(8.5%);术后24个月残留或复发18例(15.3%)。术后第6个月HR-HPV转阴率较术后第3个月升高,差异有统计学意义,较6个月后的转阴率无统计学意义。术后第6个月HR-HPV阳性者28例(23.7%),阳性者发病18例(64.3%),阴性患者无发病。术后第6个月HR-HP3V诊断病变残留或复发的敏感度和特异度分别为100.0%和90.0%,阳性预测价值和阴性预测价值分别为64.3%和100.0%。HR-HPV与TCT正确诊断率为91.5%和81.4%,Youden's指数为0.900和0.598,HR-HPV优于TCT。切缘阳性者残留或复发率(40.0%)较阴性患者(13.0%)高(P=0.045),切缘阳性者发病风险是阴性者4.5倍(95%CI=1.121~17.866)。结论:术后第6个月HR-HPV检测是监测冷刀锥切后病变残留或复发的早期敏感指标,阳性者密切监测,阴性者常规监测不增加发病风险。此外,切缘阳性是病变残留或复发的一个重要危险因素。 Objective: To investigate the significance of high-risk human papilloma virus ( HR-HPV ) DNA testing as a predictor of residual or recurrent cervical intraepithelial neoplasia ( C1N ) after cold-knife conization for high-grade CIN. Methods: HR-HPV testing, cytology, and colposcopy were conducted on 118 female patients at 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months after cold-knife conization. Pa- thology confirmed the existence of CIN as postoperative residuals or the recurrence of the disease. Results: The positive rate of postoperative histopathologic margin was 8.5% in these patients (10/118). The incidence of residual or recurrent disease was 15.3% ( 18/118 ) at 24 months after the treatment. The negative HR-HPV rate at 3 months after the surgery was lower than that at 6 months, with statistically significant differences between the two. However, no statistically significant differences were observed between the HR-HPV negative rate at the sixth month after surgery and 6 months later. Up to 28 cases at 6 months after the treatment ( 27.3% ) were HR-HPV-positive, and 18 of the 28 patients ( 64.3% ) were positive for C1N. CIN was not detected in the negative cases. At six months after surgery, the sensitivity and specificity of the HR-HPV diagnosis of the residuals of the lesion or the recurrent diseases were 100.0% and 90.0%, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 64.3% and 100.0%, respectively. The diagnosis accordance rate of the HR-HPV test and the thin-prep-liquid-based cytology test ( TCT ) were 91.5% and 81.4%, and their Youden's indices were 0.900 and 0.598, respectively. The HR-HPV test was superior to the TCT. In addition, the rate of residual or recurrence was significantly higher in patients with positive margins ( 40.0% ) than in those with negative margins ( 13.0% ). The differences were statistically significant between the two ( P = 0.045 ). The risk of residual or recurrent disease was 4.5 times higher in patients with positive margins than in those with negative margins [ OR = 4.476 ( 95% CI ) = 1.121-17.866 ]. Conclusion: HR-HPV testing at the sixth month after cold-knife conization is an early and sensitive indicator for monitoring postoperative residuals or relapse of the lesion. Close surveillance of HR-HPV-positive patients and conventional monitoring of HR-HPV negative patients will not increase the onset risk. Furthermore, the positive margin is an important dangerous factor for residual or recurrent disease.
出处 《中国肿瘤临床》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第15期906-909,共4页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology
基金 2010年广东省第一批产业技术研究与开发资金计划项目(编号:2010B031600059)资助
关键词 高危型人乳头瘤病毒 宫颈上皮内瘤变 冷刀锥切术 病变残留或复发 High-risk human papilloma virus Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Cold-knife conization Residual or recurrent disease
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Ziefinski GD, Bais AG, Helmerhorst TJ, et al. HPV testing and monitoring of women after treatment of CIN 3: review of the literature and meta-analysis[]]. Obstet Gynecol Surv, 2004, 59(7): 543-553.
  • 2Baloglu A, Uysal D, Bezircioglu I, et al. Residual and recurrent disease rates following LEEP treatment in high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions[J].Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2010, 282(1): 69-73.
  • 3Monnier-Benoit S,Dalstein V, Riethmuller D, et al. Dynamics of HPV16 DNA load reflect the natural history of cervical HPV-associated lesions[J].J Clin Virol, 2006, 35(3): 270-277.
  • 4Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology[J]. JAMA, 2002, 287(16): 2114-2119.
  • 5曾四元,梁美蓉,李隆玉,吴云燕.子宫颈上皮内瘤变Ⅲ级不同手术治疗方法的疗效及并发症比较[J].中华妇产科杂志,2009,44(8):574-577. 被引量:14
  • 6Wright TCJr, Massad LS, Dunton CJ, et al. 2006 consensus guidelines for the management of women with abnormal cervical screening tests[J].J Low Genit Tract Dis, 2007, 11 (4): 201-222.
  • 7Jeong NH, Lee NW, Kim HJ, et al.High-risk human papillomavims testing for monitoring patients treated for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J].J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2009, 35(4): 706-711.
  • 8Park JY, Kim DY, Kim JH, et al. Human papillomavirus test after conization in predicting residual disease in subsequent hysterectomy specimens[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2009, 114(1): 87-92.
  • 9VergutsJ, Bronselaer B, Donders G, et al. Prediction of recurrence after treatment for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: the role of human papiUomavirus testing and age at conisation[J].BJOG, 2006, 113(11): 1303-1307.
  • 10Panna S, Luanratanakorn S. Positive margin prevalence and risk factors with cervical specimens obtained from loop electrosurgical excision procedures and cold knife conization[]]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2009, 10(4): 637-640.

二级参考文献10

  • 1Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J. Medical treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅱ, Ⅲ: an update review. Int J Clin Oncol, 2009, 14:3742.
  • 2van Hamont D, van Ham MA, Struik-van der Zanden PH, et al. Long-term follow-up after large-loop excision of the transformation zone: evaluation of 22 years treatment of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2006, 16 : 615- 619.
  • 3Mitchell MF, Tortolero-Luna G, Cook E, et al. A randomized clinical trim of cryotherapy, laser vaporization, and loop electrosurgical excision for treatment of squamous intraepithelial lesions of the cervix. Obstet Gynecol, 1998, 92:737-744.
  • 4Kang SB, Roh JW, Kim JW, et al. A comparison of the therapeutic efficacies of large loop excision of the transformation zone and hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia Ⅲ. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2001, 11:387-391.
  • 5Hillemanns P, Kimmig R, Dannecker C, et al. LEEP versus cold knife conization for treatment of cervical intraepithelial neoplasias. Zentralbl Gynakol, 2000, 122:35-42.
  • 6Kietpeerakool C, Srisomboon J, Ratchusiri K. Clinicopathologic predictors of incomplete excision after loop electrosurgical excision for cervical preneoplasia. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2005,6:481- 484.
  • 7Souen JS, Carvalho JP, Filassi JR, et al. Treatment of carcinoma in situ of the cervix experience at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Sao Paulo. Rev Paul Med, 1992, 110:276-279.
  • 8曾四元,李隆玉,李诚信,舒宽勇,潘玫,李汉萍,罗兵,安云婷,梁美蓉,吴云燕.48例阴式扩大性子宫颈切除术临床分析[J].中华妇产科杂志,2008,43(1):41-44. 被引量:4
  • 9郎景和.子宫颈上皮内瘤变的诊断与治疗[J].中华妇产科杂志,2001,36(5):261-263. 被引量:1249
  • 10樊庆泊,Tay Sun Kuie,沈铿.子宫颈环形电切术在子宫颈上皮内瘤变治疗中的价值[J].中华妇产科杂志,2001,36(5):271-274. 被引量:470

共引文献13

同被引文献133

引证文献11

二级引证文献116

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部