期刊文献+

科学哲学的语境论进路及其问题域 被引量:9

A Contextual Approach to the Philosophy of Science and Its Problem Domain
原文传递
导出
摘要 当代科学哲学是架起哲学与科学的桥梁,其目标是为解决科学哲学的传统进路面临的科学主义与人文主义、客观主义与主观主义、绝对主义与相对主义、理性主义与非理性主义、实在论与反实在论等二元对立提供新的进路。语境论的进路有助于达到这一目标。现有的语境论进路有四种:一是认识的语境论,二是语境实在论,三是语境经验主义,四是语境论的技能获得模型。前三种进路突出了语境分析法,第四种进路有可能为语境论的科学哲学框架的形成提供具体的实现路径和机制。当科学哲学家基于科学家的认知技能获得过程来重新审视科学知识的形成与科学定律的提出时,就把认识论问题的讨论从过去只关注知识的来源与真理的问题,转化为通过规则的内化与超越而获得认知能力的问题;把规范性概念从过去追求的一个理想目标,转化为与科学家的创造性活动相伴随的不断建立新规范的一个动态过程,从而突出了对意会知识与技能性知识的研究,甚至形成一门知识学。 The contemporary philosophy of science is a bridge between philosophy and science and its goal is to provide a new approach for solving the problems of binary oppositions between scientism and humanism, objectivism and subjectivism, absolutism and relativism, rationalism and irrationalism, realism and anti-realism and so on which are faced by traditional philosophy of science. The contextual approach will help to arrive at this target. The existing four contextual approaches are as follow. The first one is epistemic contextualism, the second is contextual realism, the third is contextual empiricism, and the last one is contextual model of skill acquisition. The first three approaches have stressed contextual analysis method. The forth approach will give a route and mechanism of realization for becoming of frame of philosophy of science. When the philosopher of science based on the acquisition of cognitive ability of scientists to rethink the formation of scientific knowledge and the production of scientific laws, they will transform the discussion about the problem of epistemology from paying close attention to the source of knowledge and the problem of truth to how to acquire a cognitive ability by internalizing and beyond rules and the conception of normativity will be transformed from a ideal goal of their pursuit to a dynamic process of creation new norms with scientist creative activity.
作者 成素梅
出处 《学术月刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期53-60,共8页 Academic Monthly
基金 在2011年5月27-28日参加中国人民大学举办的"2011年自然辩证法与科学发展高级研讨会"会议论文基础上修改而成 是上海社科院科学哲学特色学科研究项目的阶段性成果之一
关键词 语境论的进路 科学哲学 体知合一 直觉 contextual approach, philosophy of science, embodiment, intuition
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1成素梅.逻辑经验主义的科学理论观及其影响[J].社会科学,2009(1):126-133. 被引量:5
  • 2George A. Feiseh, From "the Life of the Present" to the "Icy Slopes of Logic": Logical Empiricism, the Unity of Science Movement, and the Cold War, In The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, Edited by Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 58.
  • 3Hans Reiehenbach, Experience and Prediction: An Analysis of the Foundations and the Structure of Knowledge, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1938 ,Chapter 1.
  • 4Stathis Psillos, The Present State of the Scientific Realism Debate, In Philosophy of Science Today. Edited by Peter Clark and Katherine Hawley, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 59.
  • 5刘大椿、刘永谋.《思想的攻防:另类科学哲学的兴起与演化》,第25-26页,北京,中国人民大学出版社,2010.
  • 6Gerhard Preyer and Georg Peter (2005) ed: Contextualism in Philosophy : Knowledge, Meaning and Truth; Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • 7Richard H. Schlagel, Contextual Realism : a meta - physical framework for modern science, New York: Paragon House, 1986.
  • 8Longino, Helen, Science as Social Knowledge, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990.
  • 9Hubert Dreyfus, How Far Is Distance Leaning from Education? In The Philosophy of E.rpertise, Edited by Evan Selinger and Robert P. Crease, New York: Columbia University Press, 2006, pp. 196 -212.
  • 10D. Ihde,Expanding Hermeneutics : Visualism in Science, Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1998, pp. 42-43.

二级参考文献7

  • 1George A. Feisch, From ' the Life of the Present' to the ' Icy Slopes of Logic' : Logical Empiricism, the Unity of Science Movement, and the Cold War, in The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, edited by Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007, p. 58.
  • 2Paolo Parrini,Wesley C.Salmon,"Introdution" ,in Logical Empiricism: Historical & Contemporary Perspectives,edited by Paolo Parrini, Wesley C.Saimon,Merrilee H.Salmon,Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press,2003,p.1.
  • 3Thomas Ryckman,"Logical Empiricism and the Philosophy of Physics", in The Cambridge Companion to Logical Empiricism, edited by Alan Richardson, Thomas Uebel, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 218 - 219.
  • 4Grover Maxwell, "The Ontological Status of Theoretical Entities", in Philosophy of Science : The Central Issues, edited by Maitin Curd/ J. A. Cover, New York/London : W. W. Norton Company, Inc., 1988, p. 1052.
  • 5Lawrence Sklar, "Foundational Physics and Empiricist Critique", in Philosophy of Science : An Anthology, edited by Marc Lange, Malden/ Oxford/Carlton : Blackwell Publishing, 2007, p. 143.
  • 6Rudolf Carnap, Philosophical Foundations of Physics : An Introduction to the Philosophy of Science, edited by Martin Gardner, New York/ London : Basic Books, Inc. Publishers, pp. 225 - 246.
  • 7Rudolf Catnap, "Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology", in The Problem of Scientifw Realism, edited by Edwaed A. MacKinnon, New York, Meredith Corporation, 1972, pp. 103 - 122.

共引文献4

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部