期刊文献+

基金家族、家族偏爱与家族竞争策略——基于中国开放式股票型基金的经验证据 被引量:3

Fund Family,Family Favoritism and Family Competitive Strategies——Based on the Active Equity Fund Evidence
下载PDF
导出
摘要 实证研究了基金公司为提升家族整体绩效而采用的偏爱性竞争策略,结果显示同一家族旗下的"高价值"基金(高费用或高历史绩效基金)与"低价值基金"之间的绩效差异显著大于投资风格类似、但隶属于不同家族的"高价值"基金与"低价值"基金间的绩效差异;基金家族会通过转移旗下受托资产绩效的家族竞争策略使家族中高价值基金获取超额绩效,从而为家族吸引更多的净资金流入,最终实现提升基金家族竞争力和整体绩效的目标。 The empirical study of the facts that the fund companies used favoritism family competitive strategies to improve families' whole profits.The result showed the performance gap between the"high family value"funds(i.e.,high costs or high historical performance funds) and the"low value"funds in the same family was evidently bigger than the gap between the"high family value"and"low value"funds that belonged to the similar investment styles but not affiliated with the same family,the families would transfer their funds' performances to make excess performance,so as to attract more net capital inflows,finally achieve the goal to promote the fund family competitiveness and overall performance.
出处 《广东金融学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期34-43,共10页 Journal of Guangdong University of Finance
基金 教育部人文社科研究规划项目(10YJA630131)
关键词 基金家族 家族偏爱 家族价值 家族竞争策略 fund family family favoritism family value family competitive strategies
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Nanda V,Wang Z J, Zheng L. , 2004. Family Values and the Star Phenomenon:Strategies of Mutual Fund Families ,The Review of Financial Studies, Vol. 17, No. 3:667 -670.
  • 2Gaspar J. , Massa M. , Matos P. , 2006. Favoritism in Mutual Fund Families? Evidence on Strategic Cross -fund Subsidization, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 61, No. 1 : 73-104.
  • 3Gruber M J. , 1996. Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Fund, Journal of Finance, Vol. 51, No. 3:783 -810.
  • 4Sirri E,Tufano P. ,1998. Costly Search and Mutual fund Flow,Journal of Finance,Vol. 53 ,No.5:1589-1622.
  • 5Goetzmann W N ,Ibbotson R G. , 1993. Games Mutual Fund Companies Play:Strategic Response to Investor Beliefs in the Mutual Fund Industry, Working Paper, School of Management, Yale University.
  • 6Khorana A,Servaes H. ,20(Y7. Competition and Conflicts of Interest in the U. S. Mutual Fund Industry, Working Paper,College Management Georgia Institute of Technology,London Business School and CEPR.
  • 7Massa M. ,2003. Why so Many Mutual Funds? Mutual Fund Families, Market Segmentation and Financial Performance, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 67, No. 2 : 249-304.
  • 8Ivkovic Z. ,2001. ls Blood Thicker than Water:Spillovers in Mutual Fund Families, Working Paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
  • 9Zhao X. ,2004. Why Are Some Mutual Fund Closed to New Investors? ,Journal of Banking & Finance, Vol. 28 ,No. 8:1867-1887.
  • 10Huij J, Verbeek M. ,2007. SpiUover Effect of Marketing in Mutual Fund Family, Working Paper, RSM Erasmus University.

二级参考文献75

共引文献220

同被引文献57

  • 1张礼庆.非对称信息条件下基金的道德风险[J].证券市场导报,2005(2):33-36. 被引量:1
  • 2陆蓉,陈百助,徐龙炳,谢新厚.基金业绩与投资者的选择——中国开放式基金赎回异常现象的研究[J].经济研究,2007,42(6):39-50. 被引量:202
  • 3游智贤 曾婉祯.共同基金之外溢与排挤效果.财务金融学刊,2003,(2).
  • 4IVKOV1C Z. Spillovers in Mutual Fund Families: Is Blood Thicker than Walter? [R]. Working Paper, 2001.
  • 5NANDA V, WANG Z, ZHENG L. Family Value and the Star Phenomenon: Strategies of Mutual Fund Families [J]. R.eview of Financial Studies, 2004, 17(3): 667-698.
  • 6HUIJ J, VERBEEK M. Spillover Effects of Marketing in Mutual Fund Families[R]. EP.M Report Series, EFA Ljubljana Meeting Paper, 2007.
  • 7KHORANA A, SEP.VAES H. What Drives Market Share in the Mutual Fund Industry? [J]. P.eview of Finance, 2011.
  • 8MASSA M. How Do Family Strategies Affect Fund Performance? When Performance -maximization is Not the Only Game in Town [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2003, 67(2);249-304.
  • 9KAHNEMAN D. Attention and Effort [M]. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1973.
  • 10SIRRI E, TUFANO P. Cosdy Search and Mutual Fund Flows [J]. Journal of Finance, lC-98, LIII(5): 1589-1622.

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部