期刊文献+

终极控制、公司治理与地方国有公司过度投资 被引量:14

Ultimate control,corporate governance,and overinvestment by local state-owned companies
原文传递
导出
摘要 以2005~2008年中国地方国有上市公司为样本,从公司滥用自由现金流进行过度投资视角出发,研究地方政府作为上市公司终极控制人时,其持有的现金流权以及"控制权与现金流权分离"所内涵的公司治理效应。实证结果表明:(1)只有当地方政府持有的现金流权较大时,现金流权的"激励效应"才会显现,能够抑制公司滥用自由现金流进行过度投资的行为;当持有的现金流权较小时,不足以发挥激励作用。(2)控制权与现金流权分离表现出"堑壕效应",但是当地方政府持有的现金流权较大时,以过度投资攫取控制权私利的成本加大,这种"堑壕效应"会有所收敛。本研究有助于理解转轨经济时期地方国有上市公司终极控股股东与外部中小股东之间的代理冲突,丰富了关于政府控制下公司治理问题研究的实证文献。 By choosing Chinese local state - owned listed companies during the period of 2005 - 2008 as samples, from the perspective of free - cash - flow agency problems,the corporate governance effects of cash - flow rights and control rights are studied when local government is uhimate controller. The empirical re.suits indicate that ( 1 ) only when cash - flow rights held by local government is at a higher level, the cash - flow rights have the incentive effect, which can bind the behavior of abusing five cash flow for over investment; However, when cash -flow rights is at a lower level, the incentive effect is not found. (2) the divergence between control rights and cash - flow rights has the entrenchment effect. However, when cash - flow rights held by local government is at a higher level, the cost of overinvastment for private benefits is increasing, therefore, the entrenchment effect becomes moderate accordingly. The study provides enlightenment for understanding the proxy conflict between the ultimate shareholder and external minority shareholders in local state - owned listed companies during the period of transition economies, and enriches empirical literatures involving the study on corporate governance under the control of government.
作者 刘星 连军
出处 《科研管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期105-112,共8页 Science Research Management
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70772100 70902030) 教育部人文社科项目(09YJC630242)
关键词 终极控制 激励效应 堑壕效应 过度投资 ultimate control incentive effect entrenchment effect overinvestment
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1La Porta, R. , Lopez - de - Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A. Corporate ownership around the word [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1999, 54(2): 471 -518.
  • 2Claessens, S. , Djankov, S. and Lang, L.H.P. The Separation of Ownership and Control in East Asian Corporation[ JJ. Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58( 1 -2) :81 - 112.
  • 3La Porta, R., Lopez- de- Silanes, F. and Shleifer, A., Vishny, R. Investor Protection and Corporate Governance[J].Journal of Financial Economics, 2000, 58 ( 1 - 2) : 3 - 27.
  • 4Denis, D.K. and McConnell, J.J. International Corporate Governance [ J]. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2003, 38(1) :1 -36.
  • 5Bozec, Y. and Laurin, C. Large Shareholder Entrenchment and Performance: Empirical Evidence from Canada [ J ]. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 2008, 35(1 ) & (2) :5 -49.
  • 6Claessens, S. , Djankov, S. , Fan, J. P. H. and Lang, L. H. P. Disentangling the Incentive and Entrenchment Effects of Large Shareholdings [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 2002, 57 (6) : 2741 -2771.
  • 7Francis, F. , Schipper, K. , Vincent L. Earnings and Dividend Informativeness when cash flow rights are separated from voting rights [ J ]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 2005, 39(2) :329 -360.
  • 8Dittrmar, A. , Mahrt -Smith, J. Corporate Governance and the Value of Cash Holding [ J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2007, 83(3) :599 -634.
  • 9沈艺峰,况学文,聂亚娟.终极控股股东超额控制与现金持有量价值的实证研究[J].南开管理评论,2008,11(1):15-23. 被引量:107
  • 10Chong, B.S. The impact of divergence in voting and cash - flow fights on the use of bank debt [ J ]. Pacific - Basin Finance Journal, 2010, 18(2) :158 -174.

二级参考文献187

共引文献4149

同被引文献237

引证文献14

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部