期刊文献+

自编等级式分类法的类目创新研究 被引量:1

An Innovation Research of Self Hierarchical Taxonomy of Categories
原文传递
导出
摘要 中图法以学科和知识分类为基础,选择单一的分类标准,用层进的方式建立严谨的学科分类体系;而自编等级式分类法,依据资源本身和用户群特点,由网络浏览者制定、选择多个标准,通过多重列类法来实现纵向和交叉关系的类目分类。将信息资源分为学术性和非学术性,利用中图法的优势分类学术性资源;利用自编等级式的类目优势,分类非学术性信息资源。利用学术性和非学术性资源间重叠的类目,建立两个大类间的联系,方便用户快速、准确地获得信息。 Chinese library classification has a single classification criteria classified by subject and knowledge, and the strict subject classification system had been established in a progressive way. However, self-organizing hierarchical classification has multiple criteria, which was developed based on the characteristics of user groups and resources by the network viewer, and the classification of category with the vertical and horizontal relationship had been achieved through multiple classification. The information resources can be divided into academic and non-academic information, the former can be classified bY Chinese Library Classification and the latter can be classified by self-organizing hierarchical classification. The links between academic and non-academic resources can be established through the overlap between the two kinds of resources, and user can quickly and accurately access to information through the links.
作者 郭晓瑞
出处 《图书馆学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期78-81,共4页 Research on Library Science
基金 2011年河南省社科联 省经团联调研课题"高校图书馆纸质文献资源建设规划研究"(项目编号:skl-2011-587)的研究成果之一
关键词 中国图书馆分类法 自编等级式分类法 类目 分类标准 Chinese Library Classification self-organizing hierarchical classification category classification criteria
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献26

  • 1黄俊贵.中国文献编目规则的路向[J].现代图书情报技术,1995(4):25-29. 被引量:6
  • 2马然,陈树年.网络信息分类组织的新星——Folksonomy[J].新世纪图书馆,2006(4):37-39. 被引量:19
  • 3崔景昌,刘德洪.自由分类法的社会性及其利用[J].图书情报工作,2007,51(2):41-43. 被引量:15
  • 4张自立.网络分类目录及其分类法[J].大学图书馆学报,1994,(4).
  • 5Diane Neal, Guest Editor. Folksonomies and Image Tagging: Seeing the Future? . Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 2007 (11): 7-11.
  • 6钟永萍.传统文献分类法与网络信息分类法的比较研究.厦门:福建师范大学,2008:14.
  • 7David Weinberger. Taxonomies and tags: from trees to piles of leaves http: //www. hyperorg, com/blogger/misc/taxonomies _ and _ tags html, 2008-03-18.
  • 8Shirky, C. (2005) .Ontology is overrated: Categories, links and tags. http: //www. shirky. com/writings/ontology _ overrated. html, 2006-11-25.
  • 9Alireza Noruzi. Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary? .Webology, 2007 (2).Available at: http: // www. webology. ir/200?/v4n2/editorial12. html, 2009 - 05 - 14.
  • 10Niwa, S., Doi, T., & Honiden, S..Web page recommender system based on folksenomy mining. Information Processing Society of Japan (IPSJ) Journal, 2006, 47 (5): 1382-1392.

共引文献25

同被引文献31

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部