期刊文献+

福来视可调节人工晶状体的临床应用研究 被引量:3

Clinical study of the Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价福来视(Tetraflex)可调节人工晶状体植入术的临床效果。方法:白内障患者21例30眼行超声乳化手术并植入Tetraflex可调节人工晶状体。20例29眼同年龄白内障患者植入传统单焦点人工晶状体做对照。所有患者术后1d;1wk;1,3mo常规行裂隙灯检查,屈光、裸眼及矫正远视力和近视力检查。术后3mo检查调节幅度及20g/L毛果芸香碱滴眼前后的前房深度。结果:术后两组均可获得良好的裸眼远视力及矫正远视力,Tetraflex组裸眼近视力明显好于传统单焦点组。动态检影法Tetraflex组的调节幅度为2.25±0.35D,单焦点组为0.65±0.25D(P<0.01)。滴20g/L毛果芸香碱后前房深度变浅分别为0.40±0.20mm,0.15±0.11mm,两组差异有显著意义(P<0.01)。结论:Tetraflex可调节人工晶状体是安全有效的,可为患者提供良好的远近视力。 AIM:To assess the clinical outcome after implantation of the Tetraflex accommodating intraocular lens(IOL).METHODS:Thirty eyes of 21 patients with cataract had phacoemulsification implantation of Tetraflex accommo-dating IOL.Twenty nine eyes of 20 age-matched patients with cataract had the same surgery with a conventional monofocal IOL.Patients were examined 1 day,7,30,and 90 days after surgery.All patients had assessments of slit lamp,refraction,uncorrected and best corrected distance and near visual acuity.The amplitude of accommodation,anterior chamber depth(ACD) before and after application of 20g/L pilocarpine were examined 90 days after surgery.RESULTS:Postoperatively,both groups had excellent uncorrected distance acuity,and best corrected distance acuity.The mean uncorrected near visual acuity was significantly better in the Tetraflex group than in the conventional monofocal IOL group.The retinoscopic accomodative range was 2.25±0.35D in Tetraflex group and 0.65±0.25D in monofocal IOL group(P0.01).The mean ACD shoaling was 0.40±0.20 and 0.15±0.11mm after pilocarpine 20g/L eyedrops.The differences between the two groups was statistically significant(P0.01).CONCLUSION:The Tetraflex accommodating IOL is safe and effective.It can provide better distant and near visual acuity.
出处 《国际眼科杂志》 CAS 2011年第9期1546-1548,共3页 International Eye Science
关键词 白内障超声乳化 人工晶状体 调节 phacoemulsification intraocular lens accommodation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Kamlesh,Dadeya S,Kaushik S.Contrast sensitivity and depth of focus with aspheric multifocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology . 2001
  • 2Dick HB.Accommodative intraocular lenses:current status. Curr Ophthalmol . 2005
  • 3Javitt JC,Steinert RF.Cataract extraction with multifocal interlobular lens implantation: a multination clinical trial evaluating clinical, functional, and quality-of-life outcomes. Ophthalmology . 2000
  • 4Schmitz S,Dick H B,Krummenauer F,et al.Contrast sensitivity and glare disability by halogen light after monofocal and multifocal lens implantation. British Journal of Ophthalmology . 2000
  • 5Strenk S A,Semmlow J L,Strenk L M,et al.Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Investigative Ophthalmology . 1999
  • 6Pich S,Lachner B,Hanselmayer G,et al.Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifoeal intraoeular lenses. British Journal of Ophthalmology . 2001
  • 7Nakazawa M,Ohtsuki K.Apparent accommodation in pseudophakic eyes after implantation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. American Journal of Ophthalmology . 1983
  • 8Kuchle M,Nguyen NX,Langenbucher A,et al.Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. Journal of Refractive Surgery . 2002
  • 9Leyland M,Bloom P.Intraocular lens design for pseudoaccom-modation. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery . 1999
  • 10Holladay JT.Refractive power calculations for intraocular lenses in the phakic eye. American Journal of Ophthalmology . 1993

同被引文献32

  • 1葛坚.眼科学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:139-140.
  • 2Kuchle M, Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, et al. Implantation of a new accommodative posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2002; 18(3) :208-216.
  • 3Nawa Y, Ueda T, Nakatsuka M,et al. Accommodation obtained per 1.0mm forward movement of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29( 11 ) :2069-2072.
  • 4Alio JL, Tavolato M, Dela Hoz F,et al. Near vision restoration with refractive lens exchange and pseudoaecommodating and multifoeal refractive and diffi'active intraoeular lenses : comparative clinical study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004 ;30(12) :2494-2503.
  • 5Radner W, Willinger U, Obermayer W, et al. A new reading chart for simultaneous determination of reading vision and reading speed[ Jl. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd, 1998, 213 : 174-181.
  • 6张振平.人工品状体屈光手术学.北京:人民卫生出版社2009:484489.
  • 7Wolffsohn JS, Davies LN, Gupta N, et al. Mechanism of action of the Tetraflex accommodative intraocular lens [ J ]. J Refract Surg, 2010,26:858-862.
  • 8Davison JA, Simpson MJ. History and development of the apo- dized diffractive intraocular lens [ J~. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006,32:849-858.
  • 9Souza CE, Muccioli C, Soriano ES, et al. Visual performance of AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive IOL: a prospective compara- tive trial[J]. Am J Ophthalmol,2006,141:827-832.
  • 10Zlaxwe~ WA, Lane SS, Zh~u F. Performance ~f presby~pia-c~r- recting intraoeular lenses in distance optical bench tests [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2009,35:166-171.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部