期刊文献+

英语实义动词如何融入关系小句——对双重谓语句的认知功能探讨 被引量:6

How do Notional Verbs Merge into the Relative Clause——A Study of the the Double Predicate Clause from a Cognitive-functional Perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文探讨实义动词如何融入关系小句。首先以认知语法理论为依据,考察双重谓语表达式如何为范畴化结构或核准结构审定而成为复杂程度不等的范畴,又如何通过构件内在结构之间的对应而组合成为复杂而抽象的象征单位。然后从功能出发,考察双重谓语表达式如何通过在不同语类和语域中语言使用的检验而成为约定俗成的语言单位,进入整体抽象式的网络,其中的实义动词也随之融入[PredAdjSbj be PredAdj]构式,也就是本文题目中简称的关系小句。 This paper explores how some notional verbs merge into the relative clause structure.It first examines in the light of cognitive grammar how the double predicate expressions are subjected to test by the categorizing structure or sanctioning structure and become categories of varying degrees of complexity,and how the components of these expressions are integrated as complex and schematic symbolic units through the correspondence between the substructures of the components.Then in view of function the paper looks into how the expressions stand to test of language use in various genres and registers and acquire the conventional linguistic unit status,thus becoming part of the full schematic network,and meanwhile the verbs merge into the constuction of [PredAdjSbj be PredAdj],which is called relative clause for brevity in the title.
作者 任绍曾
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期21-31,共11页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 实义动词 关系小句 复杂范畴 复杂象征单位 语言单位 notional verbs relative clause complex categories complex symbolic units linguistic unit
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bolinger, D. & D. A. Sears. Aspects of Language [M]. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., 1981.
  • 2Clark, H. H. Using Language [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
  • 3Jespersen, O. Mankind, Nation and Individual From a Linguistic Point of View [ M ]. Oslo: Aschehoug, 1925.
  • 4Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By [ M ]. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 5Lakoff, G. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind [ M ]. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.
  • 6Lakoff, G. The contemporary theory of metaphor [A]. Ortony. Metaphor and Thought (2^nd ed. ) [C]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. 202-251.
  • 7Langacker, R. W. Cognitive grammar [ A ]. Droste, F. G. & J. E. Joseph. Linguistic Theory and Grammatical Description [ C ]. Armsterdam: John Benjamins, 1991. 275 - 306.
  • 8Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1 [ M ]. Stanford University Press, 1987.
  • 9Langacker, R. W. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2 [ M ]. Stanford University Press, 1991.
  • 10Langacker, R. W. The nature of grammatical valence [ A ]. Brygida Rudzka-Ostyn. Topics in Cognitive Linguistics [ C ]. Armsterdam: John Benjamins, 1988.91 - 125.

二级参考文献2

共引文献179

同被引文献72

引证文献6

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部