期刊文献+

语料库语言学在批评话语分析中的作为空间 被引量:63

The Potentials of Corpus Linguistics in Strengthening Critical Discourse Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文从批评话语分析与语料库语言学对话的基础、障碍以及方法三个方面展开讨论,旨在厘清和利用语料库语言学方法在批评话语分析中的作为空间。本文认为,语料库语言学无法在社会文化语境中对话语过程进行解释,无法处理意义潜势,而且尚难以进行高级阶的词汇语法分析。因此,其作为空间主要在于在上下文和互文语境中对语篇成品进行分析,对大量的已经实现了的意义表达方式进行批量处理,以及在低级阶进行词汇语法分析。本文据此提出具体的对话方法,以期借语料库语言学方法加强和丰富批评话语分析的研究。 The article aims to demarcate and tap the potentials of methods of Corpus Linguistics in strengthening Critical Discourse Analysis from the perspectives of dialogical foundations,barriers and measures.It is argued that Corpus Linguistics can not interpret the processes of discourses in socio-cultural context,can not handle meaning potentials and still has difficulties in making lexicogrammatical analysis at higher ranks.Accordingly,the potentials are mainly as follows: analyzing texts as products in co-text and inter-text,batch processing a large number of meaning actuals,and making lexicogrammatical analysis at lower ranks.Accordingly,some pertinent dialogical measures are proposed to strengthen and enrich Critical Discourse Analysis by borrowing methods from Corpus Linguistics.
作者 唐丽萍
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期43-49,共7页 Journal of Foreign Languages
基金 2009年度国家社会科学基金项目"美国大报(2008-2010)之中国形象的语料库语言学方法辅助下的批评话语分析"(09CYY039)的阶段性成果 "河北省高校百名优秀创新人才支持计划"的资助
关键词 批评话语分析 语料库语言学 作为空间 Critical Discourse Analysis Corpus Linguistics potentials
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1Baker, P. A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press [ J ]. Discourse and Society, 2008, (3).
  • 2Biber, D., Conrad, S. & R. Reppen. Corpus Linguistics: Investigating Language Structure and Use [M].Cambridge: CUP, 1995.
  • 3Chouliaraki, L. & N. Fairclough. Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis [ M ]. Edinburgh: Edinburgh UP, 1999.
  • 4Fairclough, N. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language [ M ]. London: Longman, 1995.
  • 5Fairclough, N. New Labour, New Language? [ M ]. London: Routledge, 2000.
  • 6Fairclough, N. & R. Wodak. Critical discourse analysis [ A ]. van Dijk, T. Discourse as Social Interaction [C]. London: Sage, 1997.
  • 7Flowerdew, J. Identity politics and Hong Kong's return to Chinese sovereignty: analyzing the dis- course of Hong Kong's first Chief Executive [J]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2004, (9).
  • 8Fowler, R. Notes on critical linguistics [ A ]. Steele, R. & T. Threadgold. Language Topics:Essays in Honour of Michael Halliday ( Vol II ) [C]. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 1987.
  • 9HaUiday, M. A. K. Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning [M]. London: Edward Arnold, 1978.
  • 10Halliday, M. A. K. An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2^nd edition) [ M ]. London: Edward Arnold, 1994.

二级参考文献101

  • 1Aijmer, K. & B. Altenberg. Advances in Corpus Linguistics[C]. Beijing : World Book Publishing Company, 2009.
  • 2Atkinson, D. The evolution of medical research writing from 1735 to 1985 : the case of the Edin- burgh Medical Journal [ J ]. Applied Linguistics, 1992, (13) : 337 -374.
  • 3Atkinson, D. A Historical Discourse Analysis of Scientific Research Writing from 1675 to 1975: The Case of the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London [ D ]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Southern California, 1993.
  • 4Baker, P. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis [ M]. London & New York: Continuum, 2006.
  • 5Baldry, A. Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age [M]. Campobasso: Palladino, 2000.
  • 6Beaugrande, R. D. The 'pragmatics' of doing language science: the 'warrant' for large-corpus lin- guistics [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 1996, (25) : 503 - 535.
  • 7Biber, D. Investigating macroscopic textual variation through multifunctional/ multidimensional analyses [J]. Linguistics, 1985, (23): 337 -360.
  • 8Biber, D. Variation across Speech and Writing[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988.
  • 9Biber, D. Oral and literate characteristics of selected primary school reading material[ J]. Text, 1991, (11) : 73 -96.
  • 10Biber, D. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison [M]. Cambridge: CUP, 1995.

共引文献278

引证文献63

二级引证文献437

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部