期刊文献+

含凹陷管道的完整性评价 被引量:47

INTEGRITY ASSESSMENT OF PIPELINE WITH DENTS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对凹陷引起的管道应力集中问题,基于深度的评价准则已不能满足工程应用,提出包含内检测、噪声处理、几何插值和应变求解的基于应变的评价流程。单纯凹陷对管道的剩余强度影响不大,但与焊缝、裂纹及划伤等其他种类缺陷联合作用时,则可能加快管道的断裂失效,可以采用弹塑性断裂理论对含裂纹和划伤凹陷进行剩余强度计算,当凹陷位于焊缝时,建议直接修复或替换。在内压波动影响下,无约束凹陷的疲劳问题较为严重,提出采用雨流计数法对管道的压力历程进行循环计数,根据疲劳累积损伤理论确定管道的疲劳寿命或检修周期。通过对目前国外主要标准的分析和比较,结合凹陷的自身特性,提出了更加合理的管道凹陷完整性评价体系。 The depth-based evaluation criteria have not been able to meet the engineering requirement concerning the pipeline stress concentration caused by dent,so this paper proposes strain-based evaluation procedure composed of inline detection,noise treatment,geometric interpolation,and strain calculation. Plain dent has little influence on pipeline residual strength,but it may accelerate pipeline fracture failure when combined with weld,crack,scratches, and other defaults. The elastic-plastic fracture theory can be used for the strength evaluation,but when the dent is near a weld,it must be repaired or replaced. Unconstrained dent faces the fatigue problem when internal pressure fluctuate. The fatigue life and maintenance period are predicted based on rainflow method and fatigue damage cumulative rule. According to the analysis and comparison of main standards and rules,this paper proposes a completely integrity assessment system of pipeline dents.
作者 焦中良 帅健
出处 《西南石油大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期157-164,200-201,共8页 Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition)
基金 国家"十一五"科技支撑计划课题(2006BAK02B01–06–1)
关键词 管道凹陷 应变计算 剩余强度 疲劳寿命 完整性评价 pipeline dent strain calculation residual strength fatigue life integrity assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献38

二级参考文献41

  • 1张团峰.关于回归函数核估计的联合渐近正态性[J].西安石油学院学报,1993,8(4):82-89. 被引量:1
  • 2赵新伟,罗金恒,郑茂盛,李鹤林,张华.弥散型腐蚀损伤管道剩余寿命预测方法[J].石油学报,2006,27(1):119-123. 被引量:20
  • 3陆基孟.地震勘探原理[M].北京:石油工业出版社,1982..
  • 4Rosenfeld, Michael J. Here are Factors that Govern Evaluation of Mechanical Damage to Pipelines [ J ]. The Oil and Gas, 2002, 100(37) :64 -69.
  • 5Leis, B N, Bubenik, T A, Francini. Recent Developments in Avoiding, Detecting and Assessing Severity of Mechanical Damage[ C ]. Proceedings of the Third International Pipeline Technology Conference. Brugge, Belgium, 2000.
  • 6Leis,B N,Francini, R B. Linepipe Resistance to Outside Force - Volume Two : Assessing Serviceability of Mechanical Damage[ R]. Final Report on Project PR 3 -9305 to the Line Pipe Research Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Council International. Battelle, 1999.
  • 7Maxey W A. Outside Force Defect Behaviors. Report to Line Pipe Research Supervisory Committee of the Pipeline Research Committee of the American Gas Association [R]. NG - 18 Report No. 162, AGA Catalogue No. L51518, Battelle, 1986.
  • 8Mayfield M, E Maxey, W A, Fracture Initiation Tolerance of Line Pipe[ C]. 6^th Symposium on Line Pipe Research. American Gas Association, Houston, Texas, 1979.
  • 9Roovers P, Bood R Galli, M Marewski, U. EPRG Methods for Assessing the Tolerance and Resistance of Pipe- lines to External Damage [ C ]. Proceedings of the Third International Pipeline Technology Conference. Brugge, Belgium, 2000.
  • 10Hopkins, P. The Application of Fitness for Purpose Methods to Defects Detected in Offshore Transmission Pipelines [ C ]. Conference on Welding and Weld Performance in the Process Industry. London, 1992.

共引文献79

同被引文献270

引证文献47

二级引证文献128

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部