期刊文献+

转移定价问题的公平交易法与全球公式法之争——美国法院一个新近判决引起的轩然大波 被引量:6

Arm's Length Principle vs.Formulary Apportionment Method:A Discussion at Length Caused by the Award to the Case
原文传递
导出
摘要 在经济全球化和知识经济的背景下,跨国企业经营的全球化趋势愈发加强,公平交易法与全球公式法之争愈发激烈。最近,美国法院的一起判决,在世界范围内,特别是在北美与欧洲,引起了轩然大波,通过此案和对此案的热烈讨论及激烈争辩,我们又一次感到了全球公式法对国际税法冲击是必然的、实质性的,颠覆性的改变是可能发生的。这个问题对有大量资本引进来、走出去的我国来说非常重要。我们必须跟踪这个问题的发展,及早做好准备。 With the background of economic globalization and knowledge economy, multination- al corporations' business are getting more and more transnational, and the battle of arm's length principle vs. global formulary apportionment has been surging on. The recent case of Xilinx Inc and Consolidated Subsidiaries vs. Commissioner of Internal Revenue has caused discussion worldwide, particularly in Europe and North America. Through this case and its discussion, we feel that glo- balization's impacts to international taxation are material, and subvertive change is possible. It is very important for China to look carefully at the issue and get prepared for possible changes as Chi na has got much foreign investment and its more and more capital now go overseas.
作者 那力
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《现代财经(天津财经大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第8期108-114,共7页 Modern Finance and Economics:Journal of Tianjin University of Finance and Economics
关键词 公平交易 全球公式法 转移定价 国际税法 fair trade global formulary apportionment transfer pricing international taxation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献4

  • 1Michelle Markham. The Transfer Pricing of Intangibles [ M]. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2005.
  • 2[美]Brian J.Anold,Michael J.McIntyre.国际税收基础[M].张志勇等译.北京:中国税务出版社,2005.
  • 3Rosanne Ahshuler, Harry Grubert. Formula Apportionment : Is It Better Than the Current System and Are There Better Alternatives? [ EB/OL]. http: //ideas. repec, org/p/btx/wpaper/0901, html, 2009 - 12 - 13.
  • 4[美]Brian J.Anold,Michael J.McIntyre.《国际税收基础》.张志勇等译.北京:中国税务出版社,2005.第125-126页.

同被引文献308

  • 1薛克鹏.政府救市行为的反思及法律控制[J].上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,12(3):34-41. 被引量:7
  • 2廖益新.国际税收协定适用于合伙企业及其所得课税的问题——以中国执行双边税收协定为视角[J].上海财经大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,12(4):19-26. 被引量:7
  • 3ChaDter one, ii of OECD Gidelines, 1995bo.
  • 42010 Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments, Parti, B-3-(i):Par. 13-45o.
  • 52010 Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments, Partl, D 3-(iv)- (b) -(I) :Par. 200 210.
  • 62010 Report on the Attribution of Profits to Permanent Establishments, Partl, D-3-(iv)- (c) -(1) :Par. 211-215.
  • 7Teodora Alecu. Transfer Pricing in 2010 and Forwards[J]. Oeconomics of Knowledge, 2010, Volume2, Issue 4.. P23-24.
  • 8Nerissa Haskic. The Arm' s Length Principle and the CCCTB:Solutions to Transfer Pricing Issues for Individual Countries and the European Union?[J].The Berkeley PRESS, 2009, Vol. 19.
  • 9European Corporate Tax Base: Making Business Easier and Cheaper, http://europa, eu/rapid/ pressRe1eaSeSAction.do?reference=IP/11/319format=HTML&aged=0&1anguage=en&guiLanguage=en.
  • 10The European Commission, Common Tax Base(2008) The European Commission, http://ec, europa, eu/taxation_ customs/taxation/company_tax/common tax base/index_en, htm.

引证文献6

二级引证文献62

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部