期刊文献+

词素间语义关系对学龄前汉语儿童理解复合词的影响 被引量:1

The Effects of Semantic Relation between Morphemes in Compounds on Preschool Chinese Children's Compound Understanding
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文采用认知心理学的实验方法研究词素间的语义关系对学龄前汉语儿童理解复合词的影响。实验材料为"性状+物体""材料+物体""用途+物体"三种语义关系的复合词,被试为幼儿园大班、中班、小班共84名儿童,实验任务是词—图匹配。结果显示,儿童理解陌生复合词的正确率随年龄的增长而升高;三个年龄段儿童理解复合词词义的正确率与词素间的语义关系有关。儿童的错误选择的特点是,倾向于根据重心语素推断复合词的词义,所犯错误也和复合词内部语义关系有关。 There are different semantic relations between nouns and their modifiers in Chinese compounds.In the experiment,three types of compounds are used,whose modifiers refers to shape,material,application respectively.The subjects are children speaking Chinese in kindergarten.The results of the experiment show that semantic relations between morphemes of compounds have effect on children's compound understanding.The proportion of choosing correct answer rises with children grows.To compounds with different types of semantic relation,the wrong choice shows different characteristics.
出处 《语言文字应用》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第3期87-95,共9页 Applied Linguistics
基金 国家语委普通话培训测试中心科研项目"学龄前儿童汉语普通话复合词理解研究"(编号:PG10022)资助
关键词 词素间语义关系 学龄前汉语儿童 理解复合词 semantic relation between morphemes preschool Chinese children compound understanding
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献7

共引文献53

同被引文献25

  • 1刘烨,傅小兰.特征类型在组合概念范畴效应中的作用[J].心理学报,2005,37(4):450-457. 被引量:5
  • 2周荐(2005)《汉语词汇结构论》,上海:上海辞书出版社.
  • 3陆志韦等.(1957).《汉语构词法》,北京:科学出版社.
  • 4北京语言大学汉语水平考试中心.(2000).《HSK中国汉语水平考试词汇大纲·汉语8000词词典》,北京:北京语言大学出版社.
  • 5黄绣然.(2008).汉语复合名词的理解:以动物、植物及加工品三类复合词为例,台湾成功大学硕士学位论文.
  • 6Book, Jeannine S. & Charles Jr. Clifton (2000) The role of salience in conceptual combination. Memory & Cognition 28: 1378-1386.
  • 7Costello, Fintan J. & Mark T. Keane (1997) Polysemy in conceptual combination: Testing the constraint theory of combination. In M. G. Shafto and P. Langley (eds.), Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 137- 142. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
  • 8Downing, Pamela (1977) On the creation and use of English compound nouns. Language 53: 810-842.
  • 9Gagne, Christina L. (2000) Relation-based combinations versus property based combinations: A test of the CARIN theory and the dual process theory of conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Lan- guage 42: 365-389.
  • 10Gagn6, Christina L.& Edward J. Shoben (1997) Influence of the maticrelations on the comprehension of modifier-noun combinations. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning, Memory, and Cogni- tion 23: 71-87.

引证文献1

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部