期刊文献+

中文版儿童作业疗法认知功能动态评定量表信度和效度的初步研究 被引量:2

The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的确定中文版儿童作业疗法认知功能动态评定量表(DOTCA—Ch)的信度和效度,为其临床应用提供理论依据。方法将英文版DOTCA—Ch翻译成中文。选取佳木斯市某小学109名学生,分别用中文版DOTCA-Ch和中国一比内智力测验法进行评定。以中国一比内智力测验法作为校标分析校标效度,采用因子分析方法进行结构效度分析,采用组内相关系数(ICC)分析方法进行测量者内信度和测量者间信度分析,应用Cronbacha系数进行内部一致性检验。结果内部一致性检验:DOTCA—Ch总Cronbach α系数为0.8920,测量者内总ICC为0.991,测量者间总ICC为0.989。在旋转后的因子负荷阵中,各领域在一个公因子中有较高负荷。将采用中国一比内智力测验法所得智商与DOTCA—Ch评分进行相关性分析,6岁组智商与总分的相关系数为0.872,11~12岁组智商与总分相关系数为0.870。结论中文版DOTCA—Ch具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为一种有效测量工具来评定儿童认知功能。 Objective To study the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the dynamic occu- pational therapy cognitive assessment for children (DOTCA-Ch). Methods The English version of the DOTCA-Ch was translated into Chinese. One hundred and nine students from the city of Jiamusi were assessed with the Chinese Binet intelligence test and the DOTCA-Ch. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used in inter-rater and intra-rater reliability assessments. Cronbach's alpha coefficient was used to assess internal consistency. Factor analysis was used to assess construct validity. Pearson correlation coefficients were used in assessing criterion-related validity. Results The total ICC of the DOTCA-Ch was 0. 892. Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the subtests were orientation 0. 713; spatial perception 0. 793; praxis 0. 850; visuomotor con- struction O. 844 and thinking operations O. 630. The /CC for intra-rater reliability was O. 991 and for inter-rater reliability it was 0. 989. Using the Binet intelligence test as a benchmark, the Pearson correlation coefficient be- tween the IQ values and the total DOTCA-Ch scores was 0. 872 for 6 ycar-olds, but 0. 870 for 11 and 12 yearolds. Factor analysis revealed an acceptable set of 5 common factors. Their cumulative contribution was 67%. Conclusions The Chinese version of the DOTCA-Ch is reliable and valid. It can be used as an effective measuring tool to evaluate children's cognitive functioning.
出处 《中华物理医学与康复杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期583-586,共4页 Chinese Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
基金 佳木斯大学校级人才培养基金项目(RC2010.24)
关键词 儿童作业疗法认知功能动态评定量表 中国-比内智力量表 信度 效度 Dynamic occupational therapy cognitive assessment for children Binet test of intelligence Validity Reliability China
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1Peadon E, Elliott EJ. Distinguishing between attention-deficit hyperac- tivity and fetal alcohol spectrum disorders in children: clinical guide- lines. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat,2010,6:509-515.
  • 2Kihara M, Carter JA, Holding PA, et al. Impaired everyday memory a- ssociated with encephalopathy of severe malaria :the role of seizures and hippocampal damage. Malar J,2009,8:273.
  • 3Goldberg TE, Koppel J, Keehlisen L,et al. Performance-based measures of everyday function in mild cognitive impairment. Am J Psychiatry, 2010,167:845-853.
  • 4李晓捷,杨宇琦,庞伟,张士岭,陈炳坤.头针结合语言训练治疗脑性瘫痪语言障碍临床疗效及相关因素分析[J].中国中西医结合儿科学,2010,2(4):326-330. 被引量:16
  • 5Katz N, Golstand S, Bar-llan RT,et al. The Dynamic Occupational The- rapy Cognitive Assessment for Children (DOTCA-Ch) : a new instru- ment for assessing learning potential. Am J Oecup Ther, 2007,61:41- 52.
  • 6孙振球.医学统计学.北京:人民卫生版社,2006:572-574.
  • 7Siegler RS. Cognitive variability:a key to understanding cognitive deve- lopment. Curr Dir Psychol Sci, 1994,3 : 1-5.

二级参考文献14

共引文献23

同被引文献20

  • 1陈秀洁,李树春.小儿脑性瘫痪的定义、分型和诊断条件[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2007,29(5):309-309. 被引量:1050
  • 2黄真.“运动学习”相关理论及其在脑性瘫痪康复中的应用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2007,22(7):652-655. 被引量:43
  • 3张文彤.spssll统计分析教程[M].北京:北京希望电子出版社.2002,6.
  • 4方积乾.医学统计与电脑实验[M].2版.上海:上海科学出版社,2001:239-250.
  • 5吴天敏.中国比内测验(第三次修订)[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1982:5.
  • 6李维.认知心理学研究[M].杭州:浙江人民出版社,1998..
  • 7赵铁菲.脑瘫儿童的语言康复训练效果与临床类型语言障碍分型及作业疗法的关系研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2005.
  • 8Sherer M,Sander AM, Nick TG,et al. Early cognitive statusand productivity outcome after traumatic brain injury : findingfrom the TBI model systems [J]. Arch Phys Rehabil, 2002, 83(2): 183-192.
  • 9Ito J, Araki A, Tanaka H, et al. Intellectual status of childrenwith cerebral palsy after elementary education [J]. Pediatr Re-habil, 1997,1(4): 199-206.
  • 10王亚薇.医院绩效评价指标考核体系的探讨[J].医药前沿,2012,2(19):34-36.

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部