期刊文献+

文拉法辛与选择性五羟色胺再摄取抑制剂对抑郁症转换策略疗效的Meta分析 被引量:8

The efficacy of venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in antidepressant switching strategies:a meta-analysis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的系统评价文拉法辛(venlafaxine)与选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(selective serotoninreuptake inhibitor,SSRI)对抑郁症转换策略疗效的差异。方法检索1990~2010年的MEDLINE和中文文献,纳入文拉法辛与SSRI对抑郁症转换策略治疗效果的随机对照试验并进行Meta分析。结果 8个随机对照试验符合纳入标准,共5350例抑郁症患者。Meta分析结果显示,文拉法辛的临床治愈率是52.5%,SSRI的临床治愈率是43.3%,二者的差异有统计学意义(OR=1.38,95%CI:1.20~1.58,P<0.01);文拉法辛的有效率是67.8%,SSRI的有效率是59.6%,二者的差异有统计学意义(OR=1.33,95%CI:1.15~1.53,P<0.01)。结论文拉法辛较SSRI对抑郁症转换策略有更高的临床治愈率与有效率。 Objective To systematically review the difference in efficacy between venlafaxine and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) in antidepressant switching strategies. Methods We conducted a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy between venlafaxine and SSRI in antidepressant switching strategies. The randomized controlled trials (RCT) were identified through searches of MEDLINE and Chinese publications for the years 1990 to 2010. Results Eight RCTs involving 5350 patients with maior depressive met inclusion criteria. Results of meta-analysis showed that the remission rates were 52.5% and 43.3% for venlafaxine and SSRI, respectively. There were statistically significant difference (OR = 1.38, 95%CI: 1.20 - 1.58, P 〈 0.01) in remission rates between the two treatment groups. The response rates were 67.8% and 59.6% for venlafaxine and SSRI, respectively. There were statistically significant difference (OR = 1.33, 95%CI: 1.15 - 1.53, P 〈 0.01) in response rates between the two treatment groups. Conclusions Remission and response rates are significantly higher in venlafaxine than in SSRI in antidepressant switching strategies.
出处 《中国神经精神疾病杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第8期449-453,共5页 Chinese Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases
关键词 文拉法辛 SSRI 转换策略 难治性抑郁症 Venlafaxine SSRI Switching strategies Treatment-resistant depression
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Trivedi MH, Rush AJ, Wisniewski SR, et al. Evaluation of outcomes with citalopram for depression using measurement- based care in STAR * D: implications for clinical practice [J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2006 163 ( 1 ) : 28-40.
  • 2Kroenke K, West SL, Swindle R, et al. Similar effectiveness of paroxetine, fluoxetine, and sertraline in primary care: a ran- domized trial[J]. JAMA, 2001,286(23) :2947-2955.
  • 3American Psychiatric Association. Practice guideline for the treatment of patients with major depressive disorder (revision). American Psychiatric Association [J]. Am J Psychiatry, 2000, 157(4 suppl) : 1-45.
  • 4Thase ME, Entsuah AR, Rudolph RL . Remission rates during treatment with venlafaxine or selective serotonin reuptake in- hibitors [ J ]. Br J Psychiatry, 2001,178 (3) : 234 -241.
  • 5Nemeroff CB, Entsuah R, Benattia I, et al. Comprehensive analysis of remission (COMPARE) with venlafaxine versus SS- RIs [ J ]. Biol psychiatry, 2008,63 (4) : 424 -434.
  • 6Poirier MF, Boyer P. Venlafaxine and paroxetine in treatment- resistant depression. Double-blind, randomised comparison [J ]. Br J Psychiatry, 1999,175(7) : 12-16.
  • 7Baldomero EB, Ubago JG, Cercos CL, et al. Venlafaxine extend- ed release versus conventional antidepressants in the remission of depressive disorders after previous antidepressant failure: ARGOS study [ J ]. Depress Anxiety, 2005,22 (2) : 68-76.
  • 8Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Bupropion-SR, sertraline, or venlafaxine-XR after failure of SSRIs for depres- sion[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006,354( 12): 1231-1242.
  • 9Corya SA, Williamson D, Sanger TM, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of olanzapine/fluoxetine combination, olanzapine, fluoxetine, and venlafaxine in treatment-resistant depression [ J ]. Depress Anxiety, 2006,23 (6) : 364-372.
  • 10Mazeh D, Shahal B, Aviv A, et al. A randomized, single- blind, comparison of venlafaxine with paroxetine in elderly patients suffering from resistant depression[J]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 2007,22(6) : 371-375.

同被引文献111

引证文献8

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部