期刊文献+

论宽严相济的刑事政策在监狱刑罚执行中的运用

The Application of Criminal Policy of "Tempering Justice with Mercy" in Penalty Executing of Prison
下载PDF
导出
摘要 宽严相济的刑事政策是当今我国的刑事政策。监狱的宗旨是惩罚和改造罪犯,监狱的根本任务是将罪犯改造成为守法公民。在监狱的刑罚执行工作中,必须贯彻宽严相济的刑事政策,做到宽严相济、区别对待,才能更有效地改造罪犯。 The criminal policy of "Tempering Justice with Mercy" is the current criminal policy in China.The purpose of the prison is "punishing and reforming the criminals",and the basic task of the prison is "reforming the criminals and making them become the lawful citizens".In penalty executing of prison,we should carry out the criminal policy of "Tempering Justice with Mercy",and discriminate the criminals,so that the criminals could be efficiently reformed.
作者 陈文峰
出处 《贵州警官职业学院学报》 2011年第4期30-35,共6页 Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词 宽严相济刑事政策 分级处遇 刑罚执行 criminal policy of "Tempering Justice with Mercy" classified treatment penalty executing
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献35

  • 1储槐植.美国刑事政策趋向[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1985,22(3):124-128. 被引量:26
  • 2武玉红.试论罪刑法定原则的“中国特色”[J].政治与法律,2002(2):55-59. 被引量:9
  • 3陈瑞华.刑事诉讼的私力合作模式——刑事和解在中国的兴起[J].中国法学,2006(5):15-30. 被引量:454
  • 4[日]野村稔.刑法总论.全理其,何力,译.北京:法律出版社,2001.
  • 5[3]Joshua Dressler, Understanding Criminal Law, Matthew Bender & Company Incorporated, 1994, P19- 24.
  • 6[5][德]汉斯·海因里希·耶塞克,等.德国刑法教科书[M].徐久生.北京:中国法制出版社,2001.
  • 7[7]Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976), Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976).
  • 8[8]Coker v. Georgia, 433 U.S. 584 (1977),Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978).
  • 9[9]Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978), Bell v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 637 (1978).
  • 10[10]Woodson v. North Carolina, 428 U.S. 280 (1976): Mandatory death penalty laws declared unconstitutional. See also Roberts v. Louisiana, 428 U.S. 325 (1976).

共引文献223

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部