期刊文献+

舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚在烧伤换药中的应用 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评估舒芬太尼(PCA)联合丙泊酚在烧伤换药中的镇痛镇静效果。方法:63例烧伤面积10%-50%、深度为浅、深Ⅱ度患者,烧伤72后首次换药时予以舒芬太尼(PCA)联合丙泊酚镇静镇痛。每组舒芬太尼于换药前5min静脉注射0.25ug/kg,PCA浓度为1ug/mL,维持为2mL/h,随机根据舒芬太尼按压锁定给药量不同分为1ug、3ug、5ug三组,每组21例,锁定时间均为5min。换药前2min靶控输注(TCI)丙泊酚,最初效应室浓度为1.5ug/kg,调整其浓度,使BIS值比基础值降低15%~20%开始换药。记录丙泊酚和舒芬太尼用量、每10min平均按压次数、给药次数及不良事件情况,计算按压次数/给药次数比值;采用VAS法进行疼痛评分,评定手术医生和患者满意度。结果:5ug组丙泊酚用量较3ug组和1ug组减少(P〈0.01,P〈0.05),而3ug组较1ug组减少(P〈0.05);舒芬太尼总使用量5ug组和3ug组较1ug组增多(P〈0.01)。换药中平均VAS评分、每10min按压次数、按压次数/给药次数比值1ug组显著高于3ug组和5ug组(P〈0.01)。5ug组和3ug组患者和医生满意度较1ug组高(P〈0.01),5ug组和3ug组比较无统计学差异(P〉0.05);5ug组眩晕发生率显著高于1ug和3ug组(P〈0.01,P〈0.05)。结论:舒芬太尼0.25ug/kg负荷量后PCA,持续2ug/h,按压泵量3mL(3ug),锁定时间5min,联合丙泊酚镇静用于烧伤病人换药是安全、可行的。
出处 《贵阳中医学院学报》 2011年第4期61-63,共3页 Journal of Guiyang University of Chinese Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献16

  • 1吴畏,杨天德,陶军,刘合年,欧珊.不同浓度异氟醚对大鼠肺脏的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2004,24(7):515-518. 被引量:9
  • 2Glass PSA, Shafter SL, Reves JG. Intravenous drug delivery system [M]. Miller RD. Anesthesia. Fifth editon. Churchill livergstone, 2001 : 377 - 411.
  • 3Gerlach K, Uhlig T, Huppe M, et al. Rernifentanil-propofol versus sufenlanil-propofol anaesthesia for supratentorial craniotomy: a randomized tria [ J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2003,20(10) :813 - 820.
  • 4Ihtiyar E, Algin C, Haciolu A, et al. Fatal isoflurane hepatotoxicity without re-exposure[ J]. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2006,25(1) :41 - 42.
  • 5Hentgen E, Houfani M, Billard V, et al. Propofol-sufentanil anesthesia for thyroid surgery: optimal concentrations for hemodynamic and electroencephalogram stability, and recovery features[J]. Anesth Analg, 2002,95 (3) :597 - 605.
  • 6Pandin PC, Cantraine F, Ewalenko P, et al. Predictive accuracy of target-controlled propofol and sufentanil coinfusion in long-lasting surgery[J]. Anesthesiology, 2000, 93 (3):653-661.
  • 7Hughes MA, Glass PSA, Jacobs JR. Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs[J]. Anesthesiology, 1992,76 (3) :334 - 341.
  • 8Thomson IR, Henderson BT, Singh K, et al. Concentrationresponse relationships for fentanyl and sufentanil in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting[J]. Anesthesiology, 1998,89(4) : 852 - 861.
  • 9Engoren M, Luther G, Fennbuderer N. A comparison of fentanyl, sufentanil, and remifentanil for fast-track cardiac anesthesia[J]. Anesth Analg, 2001,93(4) :859 - 864.
  • 10Kim SI, Han TH, Kil BY, et al. Prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting by continuous infusion of subhypnotic propofol in female patients receiving intravenous patient- controlled analgesia[J]. Br J Anesth, 2000,85(6) :898 - 900.

共引文献11

同被引文献8

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部