期刊文献+

中美假冒专利标记制度比较研究 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 中美两国的专利法中都有关于假冒专利标记的规定,其表现形式大同小异,但是中国对假冒专利标记的处罚主要以行政处罚为主,而美国对假冒专利标记行为则以公益诉讼的形式解决,任何人都可以代表美国政府对假冒者提起诉讼。中国对假冒者的行政罚款全部收归国库,而美国对假冒者的公益诉讼的罚金一半归原告,另一半归美国政府。2009年美国法院改变了罚金的计算方法,从过去的对每一批违法产品罚款500美元以下改变为对每一件违法产品罚款500美元以下,从而引起了此类诉讼的爆发。从两国法律规定、法律责任、适用条件等方面进行了对比分析,以期对我国提供借鉴。
作者 张慧霞
出处 《知识产权》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期86-91,共6页 Intellectual Property
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1London v.Everett H.Dunbar Corp. 179F.506 . 1910
  • 2Forest Group v.Bon Tool Company. 590F.3d1295 . 2009
  • 3King Tuna v.Anova Food. . 2011
  • 4Presidio Components,Inc.v.American Technical Ceramics Corp.No.08-CV-335. 2010WL1462757,at*3(S.D.Cal.Apr.132010) .
  • 5Stauffer v.Brooks Brothers,Inc. 615F.Supp.2d248,254-255 (S.D.N.Y.2009) .
  • 6Qui Tam Plaintiffs Have Standing to Sue for False Marking under35U.S.C.§292. http://www.mayerbrown.com/iplitigationenforcement/article.asp?id=9581&nid=12131 . 2011
  • 7Qui Tam Plaintiffs Have Standing to Sue for False Marking under35U.S.C.§292. http://www.mayerbrown.com/iplitigationenforcement/article.asp?id=9581&nid=12131 . 2011
  • 8James Blackburn,Monty Agarwal,Matthew Bathon.""FALSE PATENT MARKING"SUITS:HOW JUDGES AND IP RIGHTS HOLDERS CAN RESPOND TO NEW LITIGATION TREND". http //www.wlf.org/Upload/legalstudies/legalopinionletter/8-06-10Blackburn_LegalOpinionLetter.pdf . 2011
  • 9BP Lubricants Misc.No.960. . 2011
  • 10Brinkmeier v.BIC Corp.(D.Del.Filed Aug.252010). .

同被引文献15

  • 1James F Ewing,Patriciawu.美国法律下专利标记和专利虚假标记若干问题[F/OL].http://www.docin.com/p-398885143.html.2013-03-20.
  • 2R Mark McCareins, Peter Slawniak. Current state of patent false marking litigation [ J ] INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L. J. , 2011,3 (3) : 45 - 59.
  • 3Thomas F Cotter. Optimal fines for false patent marking[J]. MICH. TELECOMM. & TECH. L. REV. 2010,8(4) : 181 - 182.
  • 4Ted Sichelman,Stuart J H Graham. Why do start-ups patent? [ J]. BERKELEY TECH. L. J. 2008,4 (2) :1063 - 1070.
  • 5Craig Deutsch, Note, Restoring Truth. An argument to remove the Qui Tam provision from the false marking statute of the Patent Act [Jl MINN. J. L. SCI. & TECH. 2010,3(1) :829 -834.
  • 6Donald W Rupert. Trolling for dollars : a new threat to patent owners [ J ]. INTELL. PROP. & TECH. L. J. 1,2009,3 ( 1 ) :701 -746.
  • 7Sid Leach, Sean J O'Hara. Figuring the fine for false patent marking:how should a court determine the amount? [ J3. Journal of Law and Technology. 2011,6 (2) : 18 - 30.
  • 8Bonnie Grant. Note, deficiencies and proposed recommendations to the false marking statute : controlling use of the term ' Patent Pending' [ J ]. INTELL. PROP. L. 2004,9 ( 3 ) : 283,297.
  • 9Melvin A Eisenberg. The disgorgement interest in Contract Law [ J]. Michigan Law Review,2006,2( 1 ) : 105 - 119.
  • 10张晓都.标注专利标记与专利号是专利权人的权利还是义务[M]//国家知识产权局条法司.专利法研究.北京知识产权出版社,2004:274.

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部