摘要
"毒苹果"事件中,苹果股份有限公司(Apple Inc.)的两家供应商公司被质疑强迫正已烷中毒员工签署"先离职后赔偿"的"霸王条款",暴露了我国大陆农民工职业病维权难的问题。故特从农民工维权难的原因、不当"工伤赔偿协议"的有效性评价及签订协议后如何维权等几方面进行探讨,以供广大农民工及职业卫生与安全相关工作人员参考。
Two iPhone production line companies of Apple Inc. in China were suspected to force employees who had been poisoned by n-hexane into signing the work-related injury compensation agreements, which included some illegal clauses such as ＂first quit and then compensation＂. It disclosed the difficulties in identifying occupational disease and acquiring legal rights through legal process for the migrant workers in China. This paper discussed on the causes of such event, the validity of such work-related injury compensation agreements, and how to protect own rights after signing work-related injury compensation agreements reluctantly for the migrant workers suffered from occupational disease; and tried to give useful advices for helping such migrant workers.
出处
《环境与职业医学》
CAS
北大核心
2011年第8期503-505,共3页
Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine
关键词
职业病
工伤赔偿
维权
农民工
occupational diseases
injury compensation
legal right protection
migrant worker
