期刊文献+

语义范畴特异性损伤原因探索:物体可操作性的作用 被引量:3

Investigation on the Causes of Semantic Category-specific Deficits:The Role of Object Manipulability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨物体可操作性在语义范畴特异性损伤中的作用。方法考察1例脑外伤惠者在真假物体判断、图片命名、词图匹配、根据定义命名、属性判断、词语关联匹配等任务上生物范畴与非生物范畴分离的模式,并利用逻辑回归考察可操作性指标在范畴分离中的作用。结果该例患者表现为生物范畴特异性损伤,即在图片命名、词图匹配、根据定义命名和属性判断等任务上非生物范畴项目成绩显著好于生物范畴项目。逻辑回归发现范畴这一变量可预测命名成绩,但加入可操作性指标后,可操作性指标取代范畴成为预测该例患者命名成绩的显著因素。结论该例患者表现出的非生物范畴成绩好于生物范畴,可能是由于其操作知识的保留在语义水平上支持着非生物范畴概念的表征所导致的。 Objective To investigate the role of object manipulability in semantic category-specific deficits. Methods A brain-injured patient was tested in several tasks(Object decision, picture naming, wordpicture verification, naming to definition, attribute judgment, word-word association matching) to assess the living-nonliving dissociation. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to study the role of object manipulability in categorical dissociation. Results In picture naming, word-picture verification, naming to definition and attribute judgment, the patient performed better at nonliving items than at living items(P〈0.01). Logistic regression revealed that the predictive role of semantic category for naming accuracy was replaced by object manipulability after the latter was included in the equation(P〈0.0 1). Conclusion The better performance at nonliving items at living items of the patient could be due to his preservation of manipulation knowledge about nonliving things.
出处 《中国卒中杂志》 2011年第8期609-614,共6页 Chinese Journal of Stroke
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(30700224 30770715) 国家社科科学基金资助项目(07CYY009) 北京市自然科学基金资助项目(7082051) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目
关键词 脑损伤 神经心理学 语义学 LOGISTIC模型 Brain injuries Neuropsychology Semantics Logistic models
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Tulving, E. Episodic and semantic memory[M]//TULVING, E. & DONALDSON W. Organization of memory. Academic:New York, 1972:381-403.
  • 2Mahon BZ, Caramazza A. Concepts and categories:a cognitive neuropsychological perspective[J]. Annu Rev Psychol, 2009, 60:27-51.
  • 3Magnie M, Besson M, Poncet M, et al. The Snodgrass and Vanderwart set revisited:norms for object manipulability and for pictorial ambiguity of objects, chimeric objects, and nonobjects[J]. J Clin Exp Neuropsyc, 2003, 25:521-560.
  • 4Culham JC, Valyear KF. Human parietal cortex in action[J]. Curr Opin Neurobiol, 2006, 16:205-212.
  • 5Magnie M, Ferreira C, Giusiano B, et al. Category specificity in object agnosia:Preservation of sensorimotor experiences related to objects[J]. Neuropsychologia, 1999, 37:67-74.
  • 6Wolk DA, Coslett HB, Glosser G. The role of sensory-motor information in object recognition:evidencefrom category-specific visual agnosia[J]. Brain Lang, 2005, 94, 131-146.
  • 7Lin N, Guo QH, Han ZZ, et al. Motor knowledge is one dimension for concept organization:Further evidence from a Chinese semantic dementia case [J]. Brain Lang, 2010, in press.
  • 8舒华 程元善 等.235个图形的命名一致性、熟悉性、表象一致性和视觉复杂性评定[J].心理学报,1989,4:389-395.
  • 9Arévalo A, Perani D, Cappa SF, et al. Action and object processing in aphasia:From nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability[J]. Brain Lang, 2007, 100:79-94.
  • 10孙宏林, 孙德金, 黄建平, 等. "现代汉语研究语料库系统" 概述[C]//胡明扬. 第五届国际汉语教学讨论会论文选. 北京:北京大学出版社, 1997:459-466.

共引文献29

同被引文献125

  • 1韩在柱,柏晓利,舒华.语义范畴特异性损伤的理论研究进展[J].心理科学进展,2002,10(1):15-20. 被引量:5
  • 2周筠,韩在柱,舒华,毕彦超,曹德腾.语义范畴特异性损伤[J].中国临床康复,2006,10(18):7-9. 被引量:4
  • 3方圻,王钟林,宁田海,邵耕,陈在嘉,陆宗良,李健斋,林传骧,周北凡,诸骏仁,诸永康,陶萍,陶寿淇,龚兰生,顾复生,游凯,戴玉华.血脂异常防治建议[J].中华心血管病杂志,1997,25(3):169-175. 被引量:3067
  • 4Anderson, S. J.,Yamagishi, N., & Karavia, V. (2002). Attentional processes link perception and action. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2(59(1497), 1225-1232.
  • 5Arevalo, A., Moineau, S., Saygin, A. P., Ludy, C.,& Bates, E.(2005). In search of Noun-Verb dissociations in aphasia across three processing tasks. Center for Research in Language Newsletter, 77(1), 3-17.
  • 6Arevalo, A., Perani, D., Cappa, S. F.,Butler, A., Bates, E., & Dronkers, N. (2007). Action and object processing in aphasia: From nouns and verbs to the effect of manipulability. Brain and Language, J00(l), 79-94.
  • 7Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.
  • 8Binkofski, F.,& Buxbaum, L. J. (2012). Two action systems in the human brain. Brain and Language, 127(2),222-229.
  • 9Borghi, A. M., Bonfiglioli, C” Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters, 411(1), 17-21.
  • 10Borghi, A. M.,Flumini, A., Natraj, N., & Wheaton, L. A. (2012). One hand, two objects: Emergence of affordance in contexts. Brain and Cognition, 80(1),64-73.

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部