摘要
语用"有效性"的评估是非形式逻辑中论证评估的重要方面,国内外学者从语用方面提出了多种论证评估的标准。在修改"有效性"概念的基础上,形成了一系列"有效性"标准,主要包括普遍有效性、相干有效性、修辞有效性等。"有效性"标准与RSA标准和论证的规则相比,更适合作为"好论证"的评估标准。
The pragmatic aspect in argument assessment in informal logic is an important aspect.Domestic and foreign scholars put forward various standards of argument from the pragmatic aspect.On the basis of modifying the concept of "validity",a series of "validity" standards can be formed,mainly including universal validity,relevant validity,rhetorical validity,etc.Compared with RSA standards and the rules of argument,"validity" standards are more suitable for the evaluation standards of good argument.
出处
《华北水利水电学院学报(社会科学版)》
2011年第4期78-80,共3页
Journal of North China Institute of Water Conservancy and Hydroelectric Power(Social Sciences Edition)
关键词
非形式逻辑
论证评估
语用
有效性
Informal logic
Argument assessment
Pragmatic
Validity