期刊文献+

MHD的因果冲突、概率非随机归并视角研究——兼及MHD问题表述完整性的影响

Cause Conflict and Non-Random Probability of Merging in MHD——Descriptive Integrity Effect of MHD
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过MHD问题的标准版本、完整版本、不等值版本以及排除版本,对MHD问题困难原因的因果冲突解释、概率的非随机归并解释进行检验,对MHD表述完整与否是否存在差别进行比较,结果发现因果冲突解释得到了支持,概率的非随机归并视角并未得到支持,MHD问题是否表述完整不存在差别。 Through checking the four versions of MHD such as standard version,complete version,non-equivalent and exclusive version,cause conflict of MHD,and non-random probability of merging,compare descriptive integrity and differences.Find that only cause conflict is justified while non-random probability of merging is not supported;there is no difference in descriptive integrity of MHD.
作者 李小平
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期415-420,共6页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
基金 国家自然科学基金青年项目(30800297) 高等学校省级优秀青年人才基金项目(2009SQRS025) 安徽师范大学专项基金项目(2009xzx02)
关键词 因果冲突视角 概率的非随机归并视角 MHD问题的四个版本 表述的完整性 cause conflict non-random probability of merging four different MHD versions descriptive integrity
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1马西莫,皮亚里-泊尔马里尼.理性的错觉如何控制我们的思维[M].欧阳绛,译.北京:中央编译出版社,2005:139-168.
  • 2Krauss S,Wang X T. The psychology of the Monty Hall problem, Discovering psychological mechanisms for solving a tenacious brain teaser[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, General, 2003,132(1), 3--22.
  • 3vos Savant, M. Ask Marilyn[J]. Parade Magazine, 1990,9,15.
  • 4Johnsonaird P N,Legrenzi P. Naive probability, A mental model theory of extensional reasoning[J]. Pyschological Review, 1999, 106(1),62-88.
  • 5Aaron E, Spivey M. Frequency vs. probability formats.. Framing the three doors problem[C]. Proceedings of the twentieth annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 1998: 13-18.
  • 6Burns B D, Wieth M. The collider principle in causal reasoningz Why the monty hall dilemma is so hard[J]. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2004,133(3): 434-- 449.
  • 7余达祥,胡竹菁,邱琴.动机的概率意义——概率归并定理与Monty Hall问题的非贝叶斯解[J].心理科学,2007,30(6):1463-1465. 被引量:8
  • 8Niekerson R S. Ambiguities and unstated assumptions in probabilistie reasoning [J]. Psychological Bulletin,1996, 120: 410--433.
  • 9Levy K. Baumann on the Monty Hall problem and single--case probabilities[J]. Synthese,2007,158:139--151.

二级参考文献11

  • 1邱江,张庆林.Monty Hall Dilemma的困难原因探讨[J].心理科学,2006,29(1):222-224. 被引量:5
  • 2Selvin S. On the Monty Hall problem. American Statistician, 1975a, 29:134
  • 3Selvin S. A problem in probability. Americall Statistician, 1975b, 29:67
  • 4Vos Savant M. Ask Marilin. Parade Magazine, 1990a:15
  • 5Vos Savant M. Ask Marilin. Parade Magazine, 1990b:25
  • 6Vos Savant M. Ask Marilin. Parade Magazine, 1991:12
  • 7Gilovieh T., Medvec V H., & Chen S. Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the "Monty Hall" problem. Personality and social psychology Bulletin, 1995
  • 8Johnson - Laird P N., Legrenzi P., Girotto V., Legrenzi M S., Caverni J P. Naive probability: A mental model theory of extensional reasoning. Psychological Review, 1999,106:62 -88
  • 9Stefan Krauss, X T Wang. The psychology of the Monty Hall problem: Discovering Psychological Mechanisms for Solving a Tenacious Brain Teaser. Journal of experimental psychology, General, 2003, 132 (1):3-22
  • 10潘一民.概率论.现代数学手册.随机数学卷.华中师范大学出版社,2000

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部