期刊文献+

英语研究论文讨论部分中的强势语 被引量:8

Boosting in Discussion Sections of Research Articles
下载PDF
导出
摘要 强势语是英语研究论文中常用的修饰作者论断的语言手段。在研究论文的讨论部分所使用的强势语相对丰富。强势语对增加陈述力度、表达确信、增强说服力起着重要作用,人文社会科学和自然科学研究论文所使用的强势语不但频次有差异,而且所使用的强势语类型、形式和功能也表现出不同的特点,这些差别与不同学科的论证策略和研究对象和方法的不同密切相关。 Boosters are important linguistic devices to modify claims and statements in academic discourse an they are rich in the discussion sections of research articles.Boosters play an important role in boosting the force of statements,expressing strong conviction and convincing the readers.The different strategies of using booster in 'humanities social sciences' and 'natural sciences' are not only reflected in frequency,but also in the types,forms and functions of boosters.These differences are closely related to the different argumentative strategies,objects of study and research methods of different disciplines.
作者 李红梅
出处 《安徽师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第4期447-452,共6页 Journal of Anhui Normal University(Hum.&Soc.Sci.)
关键词 强势语 研究论文 语料库 讨论部分 boosters research articles corpus discussion section
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Holmes, J. Expressing Certainty and Doubt in English [J]. RELC Journal, 1982,13(2):18.
  • 2Hyland K. Metadiscourse. Exploring Interaction in Writing [ M]. London, New York: Continuum. 2005:53.
  • 3Hyland, K. Boosting, hedging and the negotiationof academic knowledge [J]. Text,18 (3) : 1998.
  • 4Vassileva, Irena. Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing [J]. English for Specific Purposes, 2001, 20: 86.
  • 5Halliday, M. A. K. and C. M. I. M. Matthiessen. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. (3th ed). London: Hodder Arnold. 2004:116.
  • 6Holmes, J. Doubt and certainty in ESL textbooks [J]. Applied Linguistics, 1988, 9(1).
  • 7Tannen, D. Framing in Discourse[M]. New York: Oxford Press. 1993: 44.
  • 8Kreutz, H. and A. Harres. Some observations on the distribution and function of hedging in German and English aeademie writing[C] //In A. Duszak (Ed.) Culture and Styles of Aeademie Diseourse. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1997 : 190.
  • 9Rizomilioti. V. Exploring epistemie modality in aeademie discourse using eorpora [C] //In E. A. Macia, A.S. Cervera, C. R. Ramos (Eds.) Information Technology in Languages for Specific Purposes. New York: Springer, 2006: 55.
  • 10Skelton, J. The Representation of Truth in Academic Medical Writing[J]. Applied Linguistics, 1997, 18(2) ..129--130.

同被引文献21

引证文献8

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部