期刊文献+

民众社会公平期望的结构及其预测机制 被引量:3

The Structure of Social Justice Expectations and its Related Prediction Mechanisms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本研究旨在编制民众社会公平期望问卷及对影响民众社会公平期望的机制进行初步探索。在广泛访谈的基础上,经过问卷的编制、初测和再测,形成了三个维度,即分配公平、程序公平和公平控制;问卷内部一致性信度为0.96,验证性因素分析结果证明了问卷具有较好的结构效度。通过问卷编制发现:民众的社会公平期望在年龄和职业上存在显著差异,在年龄差异上,41~50岁年龄段的民众程序公平期望最低,31~40岁年龄段的男性社会公平期望水平要远高于女性;在职业差异上,无业人员的分配公平期望最低,而国家机关和事业单位的工作人员公平控制期望最高。同时研究发现了积极社会信念在公平体验和公平期望之间起到部分中介作用,研究没有发现过去生活满意度对公平期望的预测作用。 This research aims to develop the questionnaire of social justice expectations and discuss the impact of the mechanism on social justice expectations.Based on extensive interviews and first survival,amendment,and re-measurement,social justice expectations questionnaire is composed of three dimensions: distribution justice expectation,procedure justice expectation,and justice control expectation.The Cronbach's coefficient of the questionnaire is 0.96,and its EMS results show high structure validity.As a whole,there are significant differences in social justice expectations with different ages and professions.In the respect of age differences,the 41-50 age group has the lowest procedure justice expectation;the 31-40 male age group has much higher social justice expectation than that of women.In the respect of occupational differences,unemployed workers have the lowest distribution justice expectation,while national civil servants and institutions staff have the highest justice control expectation.Positive social belief plays partial mediate role in the relationship between justice experience and justice expectations,but there are no findings showing that life satisfaction can predict social justice expectations.
出处 《公共管理学报》 CSSCI 2011年第3期80-90,126-127,共11页 Journal of Public Management
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金(DUT11RW418) 国家社会科学基金资助项目(09BZZ017)
关键词 社会公平期望 过去公平体验 过去生活满意度 积极社会信念 民众 Social Justice Expectations Justice Experience Life Satisfaction Positive Social Belief The Public
  • 相关文献

参考文献29

  • 1COLQUITT J A, CONLON D E, WESSON M J, et al. Justice at the Millenium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Or- ganizational Justice Research. [J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2001, 86(3): 425-445.
  • 2李晔,龙立荣,刘亚.组织公正感研究进展[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(1):78-84. 被引量:84
  • 3BROCKNER J, ACKERMAN G, FAIRCHILD G. When Do Elements of Procedural Fairness Make a Difference? A Classi- fication of Moderating Influences [ M ]. Stanford : Stanford University Press, 2001 : 179-212.
  • 4SHAPIRO D L, KIRKMAN B L. Anticipatory Injustice: The Consequences of Expecting Injustice in the Workplace [M]. Lexington: New Lexington, 2001: 152-178.
  • 5STEINER D D, GILLILAND S W. Procedural Justice in Personnel Selection: International and Cross-Cultural Pers- pectives[J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2001, 9(1-2): 124-137.
  • 6DARKES J, GOLDMAN M S. Expectancy Challenge and Drinking Reduction: Experimental Evidence for a Mediational Process. [J]. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1993, 61(2): 344-353.
  • 7LIND E A, KRAY L, THOMPSON L. Primacy Effects in Justice Judgments: Testing Predictions from Fairness Heuristic Theory [J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proeesses, 2001, 85(2): 189-210.
  • 8SHAPIRO D L, KIRKMAN B L. Employees' Reaction to the Change to Work Teams: The Influence of Anticipatory In- justice [J]. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 1999, 12( 1 ): 52-66.
  • 9BELL B S, RYAN A M, WIECHMANN D. Justice Expecta- tions and Applicant Perceptions [J]. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 2004, 12( 1-2 ) : 24-38.
  • 10BELL B S, WIECHMANN D, RYAN A M. Consequences of Organizational Justice Expectations in a Selection System[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2006, 91 (2) : 455-466.

二级参考文献115

  • 1李强,姚琦,乐国安.新员工组织社会化与入职期望研究[J].南开管理评论,2006,9(3):38-43. 被引量:32
  • 2马华维,姚琦.新员工入职期望及其影响因素[J].心理科学,2007,30(1):79-83. 被引量:5
  • 3Roese N J, Sherman J W. Expectancy. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (Vol. 2), 2007, New York: Guilford Press.
  • 4Kammeyer-Mueller J D, Wanberg C R. Unwrapping the organizational entry process: disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2003, 83(5) : 779 - 794
  • 5Porter L W, Steers R M. Organizational, work, and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 1973,80(2) : 151 - 176
  • 6Dean R A, Ferris K, Konstans C. Reality shock: reducing the organizational commitment of professionals. Personnel Administrator, 1985, 26: 139-148
  • 7Major D A, Kozlowski S W J, Chao G T. A longitudinal investigation of newcomer expectations, early ,socialization outcomes, and the moderating effects of role development factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1995, 80(3): 418-431
  • 8Buckley M R, Fedor D B, Veres J G, et al.. Investigating newcomer expectations and job-related outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998,83(3) :452 - 461
  • 9John S, Jason S, Miehelle D. An under-met and over-met expectations model of employee reactions to merit raises. Journal of Applied Psychology. 2008, 93(2): 424-434
  • 10Martell R F, Evans D P. Source-monitoring training: toward reducing rater expectancy effects in behavioral measurement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2005,90(5) :956 - 963

共引文献390

同被引文献57

引证文献3

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部