期刊文献+

两种高超声速一体化构型的气动性能对比分析 被引量:4

Aerodynamic Performance Research of Two Integrated Hypersonic Configurations
下载PDF
导出
摘要 高超声速飞行器目前已经成为世界各大国航空航天发展的主要目标之一。以美国X-43A和X-51两高超声速飞行器为研究对象,对两类飞行器气动性能进行了数值模拟,并以此为基础对比分析了两类高超声速飞行器的一体化气动特性。研究结果表明:燃料入射角对飞行器的稳定性(包括俯仰力矩、滚转力矩)和气动力影响剧烈,在相同的燃料入口条件下(流量、进口压力),入射角-20°可以达到升力最大、俯仰力矩最小状态;在相同的有效容积下,X-51在气动稳定性上明显劣于X-43A,俯仰力矩上高出X-43A15%~28%,滚转力矩上高出10%~24%。 Hypersonic vehicle has become one of main goals about development of aerospace in the major world powers.Analysis research of X-43A and X-51 is conducted.Aerodynamics research of two hypersonic configurations integrated with scramjet is present based on three-dimensional simulation.Investigation shows that fuel impingement angle is of an important influence on moments(including the pitching moment and roll moment) and aerodynamic force.In the same fuel inlet condition,hypersonic vehicle can get the maximum lift and minimum pitching moment in the condition that the fuel impingement angle is-20°.In the same volumetric capacity condition,X-43A has dominant species in aerodynamic stability compared with X-51.The pitching moment and roll moment of X-51 are higher by 15%~28% and 10%~24%,respectively.
出处 《航空工程进展》 2011年第3期305-311,共7页 Advances in Aeronautical Science and Engineering
关键词 高超声速 一体化 气动性能 燃烧室 稳定性 hypersonic integration aerodynamics performance combustion chamber stability
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1吴丁毅,肖洪,刘振侠,廉筱纯.基于吻切分析法的乘波构型前体设计与性能模拟[J].弹箭与制导学报,2008,28(4):172-174. 被引量:3
  • 2Laurie A Marshall,Catherine Bahm,Griffin P Corpening.Overview with results and lessons learned of the X-43A mach 10 flight. Jounary of Aircraft . 2007
  • 3Laurie A Marshall,Griffin P Corpening.A chief engineer’’s view of the NASA X-43Ascramjet flight test. AIAA 2007-0410 . 2007
  • 4X-43A Mishap Investigation Board.Report of Findings X43A Mishap. www.nasa.gov/pdf/47414main_x43A_mishap.pdf . 2003
  • 5Andrew Clark.Development of an airframe-propulsion integrated generic hypersonic vehicle model. AIAA-2006218 . 2006
  • 6Timothy Wadhams.A review of transition studies on fullscale flight vehicles at duplicated flight conditions in the lens tunnels and comparisons with prediction methods and flight measurement. AIAA-2010-1246 . 2010
  • 7Xiao Hong,Liu Zhenxia,Wu Dingyiet al.Simulation and experiment of hypersonic waverider forebody integrated with inlet. AIAA-2006-8090 . 2006
  • 8Hank,J.The X-51A Scramjet Engine Flight Demonstration Program. AIAA 2008-2540 . 2008
  • 9Gupta K K,Voelker L S.CFD-Based aeroelastic analysis of the X-43 hypersonic flight vehicle. AIAA paper 01-0712 . 2001

二级参考文献4

  • 1Sobieczky H,Dougherty F C,Jones K. Hypersonic waverider design from given shock waves[C]// 1st International Waverider Symposium, University of Maryland, 17-19, 10, 1990.
  • 2Starkley R P, Lewis M J. Simple analytical model for parametric studies of hypersonic waveriders [J]..Journal of Spacecraft and Rockers, 1999, 36 (4) :516-523.
  • 3Starkley R P, Lewis M J. Critical design issues for airbreathing hypersonic waverider missiles [J ]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2001, 38 (4): 510-519.
  • 4Goldfeld M A. Experimental study of 3-D inlets for high supersonic flight velocities[Z]. The Science Report of the International Center ot: Aerophysical Research, Russian Academy of Sciences (Siberian Division), 1994.

共引文献2

同被引文献70

引证文献4

二级引证文献61

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部