以社会规则理论重释法律行为效力的来源

Re-interpreting the Source of Law Action Validity by Way of Social Norm Theory

民法的基本问题是法律行为,而法律行为的效力来源同样是民法学界一直讨论的问题。对法律行为不同效力来源的看法不仅涉及到自然法、实证法的立场,而且暗含着对意思自治原则的不同理解。虽然,理性自然法的意志决定论影响深远,但随着休谟问题的提出、自然法的没落和实在法的兴起,法律行为的效力根据也发生了巨大变化。但以往将法律行为效力来源简单地归结于实在法或公权力,是对"实证"观念的粗糙理解。本文运用哈特的社会规则理论重释法律行为的效力来源,并探讨法律行为推定生效的思想根源。

The basic issue is law action in the civil law and the source of law action validity is also discussed continuously. The different interpretations will be related with natural law and demonstration and what＇s more, there is different understanding and the rising of positive law, great changes of the principle of autonomy. With the decline of natural law have taken place in the evidence of law action validity. The opinion that law action validity simply attributes to the positive law or public power is a rough understanding of demonstration. This paper applies the social norm theory by Hart reinterprets the source of law action validity and also explores the root of presumption validity in law action.