期刊文献+

帖学不继 碑学未成 碑帖相融的稚弱——清代书法反思 被引量:2

Discontinuous Study of Copybook,Unsuccessful Study of Tablet Inscription,Naive and Weak Blending of Copybook and Tablet Inscription for Calligraphy——Reflection of Qing Dynasty Calligraphy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清代书法分帖学和碑学两大创作流派和发展阶段。帖学未能很好继承前朝成就,碑学理论和实践存在诸多不足,后期沈曾植等人在碑帖相融方面作出一些尝试和探索,但尚显稚弱。反思清代书法,可为当今书法艺术发展提供有益借鉴。 The Qing dynasty calligraphy can be divided into two main creative sects and developing periods,that is the study of copybook and tablet inscription. But the study of copybook didn't carry on predecessors' achievement,and the construction and practice of tablet inscription had some shortcorming. The blending efforts of copybook and tablet inscription in later period showed some initial attempts and studies. Reflecting of Qing dynasty calligraphy can help us to improve modern calligraphy art and provide useful references.
作者 兰浩
出处 《太原理工大学学报(社会科学版)》 2011年第2期78-82,共5页 Journal of Taiyuan University of Technology(Social Science Edition)
关键词 清代书法 帖学 碑学 碑帖相融 Qing dynasty calligraphy study of copybook study of tablet inscription blending of copybook and tablet inscription
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1康有为.广艺舟双楫[M].上海:上海书画出版社,2008.
  • 2白蕉.碑与帖[M]//20世纪书法研究丛书:历史文脉篇.上海:上海书画出版社,2000:152.
  • 3曹建.康有为“帖学大坏”论及其影响[J].文艺研究,2006(11):128-138. 被引量:11
  • 4王道云.书法门诊室:一[M].南京:江苏美术出版社,2002:1-3.
  • 5钱穆.中国历代政治得失[M].上海:生活·读书·新知三联书店,2009:127,134,142.
  • 6杜家骥.清朝简史[M].福州:福建人民出版社,2005:84.
  • 7沙孟海.近三百年的书学:历史文脉篇[M].上海:上海书画出版社,2008:16.

共引文献12

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部