期刊文献+

胸腹水中端粒酶活性癌胚抗原与细胞学联合检查的临床诊断价值初探 被引量:2

THE CLINICAL VALUE OF COMBINED USE OF TELOMERASEACTIVITY,CEA AND CYTOLOGY IN THE DETECTIONOF PLEURAL EFFUSION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察胸腹水中端粒酶活性(TA)、癌胚抗原(CEA)与脱落细胞学联合检查诊断恶性胸腹水性质的价值。方法分别应用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)与化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)方法对200例良恶性胸腹水中的TA、CEA进行检测,同时进行胸腹水脱落细胞学检查。结果恶性胸腹水TA与CEA水平显著高于良性胸腹水中TA与CEA含量(P均<0.01)。应用TA诊断恶性胸腹水的阳性率为80.9%,特异性为86.0%,准确性为92.9%;CEA诊断阳性率为64.3%,特异性为91.8%,准确性为76.0%;TA+CEA诊断阳性率为90.4%,特异性为89.4%,准确性为90.0%。结论 TA是判断良恶性胸腹水的性质的较为准确和敏感的指标,联合测定CEA含量,同时进行脱落细胞学检查可明显提高恶性胸腹水的阳性诊断率。 Objective To determine the clinical value of the combined use of telomerase activity(TA),carcino-embryonic antigen(CEA) and cytology in the detection of pleural effusion.Methods The concentrations of TA and CEA in pleural effusion were respectively determined by EILSA and CLIA.Meanwhile,the pleural effusion cytology was performed.Results The levels of TA and CEA in malignant pleural effusion were significantly higher than those in the benign pleural effusion(P0.01).The TA Detection revealed that the positive rate of malignant pleural effusion was 80.9%,the specificity was 86.0% and the accuracy was 92.9%.The CEA detection showed that the positive rate of malignant pleural effusion was 64.3%,the specificity was 91.8% and the accuracy was76.0%.The comined use of TA and CEA showed the positive rate of malignant pleural effusion was 90.4%,the specificity was 89.4% and the accuracy was 90.0%.Conclusion It is accurate and sensitive when TA detection is applied to determine the nature of pleural effusion.It can significantly improve the positive rate when the detection of TA,CEA and cytology in pleural effusion were combined in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusion.
出处 《山东医学高等专科学校学报》 2011年第4期244-246,共3页 Journal of Shandong Medical College
关键词 胸水 腹水 端粒酶活性 癌胚抗原 细胞诊断学 Pleural effusion Ascites Telomerase activity Carcino-embryonic antigen Cytodiagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献13

  • 1孙志贤.肿瘤标志物-神经元特异性烯醇化酶的临床意义[J].国外医学临床生物化学分册,1989,10(2):8-8.
  • 2Miedouge M,Salama G,Barange K,et al. Evaluation of alpha-fetoprotein assay in ascitic fluid for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Clin Chim Acta,1999,280(1-2):161-171
  • 3Mas MR,Comert B,Saglamkaya U,et al. CA-125;a new marker for diagnosis and follow-up of patients with tuberculous peritontis[J]. Dig Liver Dis,2000,32(7):595-597
  • 4陈冠生.临床放射免疫分析手册[M].北京:原子能出版社,1997.109.
  • 5贺佑丰译.放射免疫分析与相关技术进展[M].北京:原子能出版社,1996.159.
  • 6HARLEY C B,FUTCHER A B,GREIDER C W,et al.Telomerase short enduringaging of human fibroblast[J].Nature,1990,345(6274):458-460.
  • 7CHENG T Y,LEE M H,LAN R S,et al.Telomerase activity in pleural effusions diagnostic significance[J].J Clin Oncol,1998,16(4):567-573.
  • 8夏铁安 王淑娟 等主编.肿瘤相关抗原测定[A].王淑娟,等主编.现代实验诊断学手册[C].北京:北京医科大学/协和医科大学联合出版社,1995.444.
  • 9潘昆贻,郭秀筠,郑治修,李红玉.消化系肿瘤患者血清CA19-9的检测[J].中国医师杂志,2000,2(2):113-113. 被引量:9
  • 10许翠萍,杨蕊萍.联合检测血清与腹水肿瘤标志物对消化系恶性肿瘤的诊断价值[J].临床消化病杂志,2000,12(4):161-163. 被引量:19

共引文献9

同被引文献27

  • 1Wu Y, Zakian VA. The telomeric Cdcl3 protein interacts directly with the subunit Estl to bring it to telomerie DNA ends in vitro[J]. Proe Natl Aead Sei U S A, 2011,108(51 ):20362-20369.
  • 2Ciurea R, Margaritescu C, Simionescu C, et al. VEGF and his R1 and R2 receptors expression in mast cells of oral squamous cells carcinomas and their involvement in tumoral angiogenesis[J]. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2011,52(4):1227-1232.
  • 3Markovets AM, Fursova AZ, Kolosova NG. Therapeutic action of the mitoCHondria-targeted antioxidant SkQ1 on retinopathy in OXYS rats linked with improvement of VEGF and PEDF gene expression [.J]. PLoS One, 2011,6(7):21682.
  • 4Azab KSh, Osman SA, E1-Fatih NM. Implication of caspase-3 and granzyme B expression and activity in spleenocytes of ehrliCH as- cites carcinoma mice subjected to immunotherapy[J]. N-A-J-Med- Sci- (Hamilt), 2011,3(8):371-377.
  • 5刘成玉,罗春丽.临床检验基础[M].第5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:184-188.
  • 6Van der Bij S ,Schaake E, Koffijberg H. Markers for the non-invasive diagnosis of mesothelioma: a systematic review[J]. BrJ Cancer, 2011, 104(8): 1325-1333.
  • 7Dikensoy O, Celik N, Kul S. Ischemia modified albumin in the differential diagnosis ofpleural effusions[J]. Resprir Me-d, 2011, 105 (11): 1712-1717.
  • 8Rodriguez-Pineiro AM, Blanco-Prieto S, Sanchez-Otero N. On the identification of biomarkers for non-small cell lung ca-ncer in serum and pleural effusion[J]. J Proteomics, 2010, 73 (8) :1511-1522.
  • 9Zhang JX, Xie CM ,Zhu ZW. Potential role of AQP1 and VEGF in the development of malignant pleural effusion in m-ice[J]. Med Oncol, 2012 ; 29(2): 656-662.
  • 10Rashid-KolvearF, Taboski MA, Nguyen J. Troglitazone sup-presses telomerase activity independently of PPAR gamma in estrogen-receptor negative breast cancer cells[J]. BMC Cancer, 2010, 10(1): 390.

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部