期刊文献+

重新认识淋巴结清扫在前列腺癌根治术中的意义 被引量:3

下载PDF
导出
摘要 前列腺癌根治术是局限性前列腺癌的有效治疗方法。国内常用的手术方式是在行前列腺癌根治术前先行盆腔淋巴结切除术,如术中发现有盆腔淋巴结转移,则通常意味着预后不良,患者丧失行根治手术的时机,处理方式是不做前列腺根治性切除,而改为内分泌治疗。近年来的一些研究结果提示,对于盆腔淋巴结阳性患者行前列腺根治性切除可提高其远期生存率。因此,我们必须重新认识淋巴结清扫在前列腺癌根治术中的意义。
作者 孙颖浩
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期489-491,共3页 Shanghai Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1CAGIANNOS I, KARAKIEWICZ P, EASTHAM J A, et al. A preoperative nomogram identifying decreased risk of positive pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer [J]. J Urol, 2003, 170(5): 1798-1803.
  • 2HAN M, SNOW P B, BRANDT J M, et al. Evaluation of artificial neural networks for the prediction of pathologic stage in prostate carcinoma[J]. Cancer, 2001, 91(8 Suppl): 1661- 1666.
  • 3BHATTA-DHAR N, REUTHER A M, ZIPPE C, et al. No difference in six-year biochemical failure rates with or without pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in low-risk patients with localized prostate cancer[J]. Urology, 2004, 63(3): 528-531.
  • 4HEIDENREICH A, VARGA Z, VON KNOBLOCH R. Extended pelvic lymphadeneetomy in patients undergoing radical prostateetomy: high incidence of lymph node metastasis[J]. J Urol, 2002, 167(4) : 1681-1686.
  • 5BRIGANTI A, CHUN H F,MONTORSI F, et al. Extend lymphadenectomy should be performed in patients with PSA ≥6 ,biopsy gleason score 7-10 and stage T2 or higher prostate cancer[J]. Eur Urol Suppl, 2006, 5(2): 174.
  • 6WALSH P C, DONKER P J. Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention [ J ]. J Urol, 1982, 128(3): 492-497.
  • 7ENGEL J, BASTIAN P J, BAUR H, et al. Survival benefit of radical prostatectomy in lymph node-positive patients with prostatecancer[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 57(5): 754-761.
  • 8BADER P, BURKHARD F C, MARKWALDER R, et al. Disease progression and survival of patients with positive lymph nodes after radical prostatectomy. Is there a chance of cure? [J]. J Urol, 2003, 169(3):849-854.
  • 9PALAPATTU G S, SINGER E A, MESSING E M. Controversies surrounding lymph node dissection for prostate cancer[J]. UrolClinNorthAm, 2010, 37(1): 57-65.

同被引文献31

  • 1孙康伟,袁建林,杨晓剑,王延柱,孟平,张龙龙,武鹏.机器人辅助腹腔镜下前列腺癌根治术38例临床分析[J].微创泌尿外科杂志,2014,3(3):132-134. 被引量:5
  • 2Sung G T, Gill I S..Robotic laparoscopic surgery., a comparison of the DA Vinci and Zeus systems[J]. U- rology, 2001, 58(6): 893-898.
  • 3Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering T E, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 418-430.
  • 4Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen R C, et al. Systematic re- view and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary con- tinence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatecto- my[J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 405-417.
  • 5Novara G, Ficarra V, Mocellin S, et al. Systematic re- view and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. [J]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 382-404.
  • 6Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen R C, et al. Systematic re- view and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostateetomy []]. Eur Urol, 2012, 62(3): 431-452.
  • 7Coelho R F, Chauhan S, Palmer K J, et al. Robotic- assisted radical prostatectomy: a review of current out- comes[J]. BJUInt, 2009, 104(10): 1428-1435.
  • 8Smith J A Jr, Chan R C, Chang S S, et al. A compari- son of the incidence and location of positive surgical margins in robotic assisted laparoscopic radical prosta- tectomy and open retropubie radical prostatectomy[J]. J Urol. 2007 Dec 178 (6) : 2385 - 2389, discussion 2389-2390.
  • 9Nelson B, Kaufman M, Broughton G, et al. Compari- son of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotie assisted laparoscopic prosta- tectomy[J]. J Urol, 2007, 177(3): 929-931.
  • 10Guillonneau B, Jayet C, Tewari A, et al. Robot assis- ted laparoscopic nephreetomy[J]. J Urol, 2001, 166 (1): 200-201.

引证文献3

二级引证文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部