期刊文献+

合理选择穿刺针数和位点提高初次及重复前列腺活组织检查的阳性率:1293例临床分析 被引量:2

Proper biopsy cores and sites to improve positive detecting rates of initial and repeated prostate biopsy: a clinical analysis of 1293 cases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析如何通过增加穿刺位点提高前列腺初次穿刺和重复穿刺的阳性率。方法 2006年1月—2009年6月共完成直肠超声引导经会阴前列腺穿刺1 293例,其中采用常规6点法穿刺250例,采用"6+X"法穿刺1 043例。比较不同穿刺方法的阳性率及其与前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)和经直肠超声(TRUS)检查表现的关系,并分析行重复活组织检查病例的阳性率。结果 "6+X"法穿刺的阳性率为46.4%,显著高于常规6点法的42.9%(P<0.05)。PSA≤4 ng/mL、>4且≤10 ng/mL、>10且≤20 ng/mL、>20且≤30 ng/mL4组中"6+X"法穿刺的阳性率均显著高于常规6点法(P值均<0.05);而PSA>30 ng/mL各组中,两种穿刺方法阳性率的差异无统计学意义(P值均>0.05)。超声表现正常、低回声结节、高回声或等回声结节3组的阳性率分别为23.1%、60.3%和32.1%,低回声结节组的阳性率显著高于另两组(P值均<0.05)。重复穿刺共54例,按最终病理检查结果分为良性和恶性组,恶性组首次穿刺发现高级别前列腺上皮内瘤样增生(PIN)、前列腺小腺泡不典型增生(ASAP)以及TRUS发现新的低回声结节的构成比均显著高于良性组(P值均<0.05)。结论 "6+X"法TRUS引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺技术对诊断前列腺癌安全、有效,对于PSA水平较低的患者增加穿刺针数对提高阳性率更有意义,对首次穿刺证实为高级别PIN、ASAP或TRUS发现新的可疑病灶者应积极接受重复活组织检查。 Objective To analyze how to improve the positive detecting rates (PDR) of initial or repeated prostate biopsy by increasing the biopsy cores and sites. Methods A total of 1 293 patients received TRUS-guided transperineal prostate biopsy from Jan 2006 to June 2009, including 250 cases undergoing conventional sextant biopsy and 1 043 cases undergoing extended sextant biopsy. The PDR values were compared between the two groups and their relationship with prostate specific antigen (PSA) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images was analyzed. The positive rate of repeated biopsy cases was analyzed as well. Results The PDR values of sextant and extended sextant groups were 42.9% and 46.4%, respectively (P〈0.05). According to the PSA levels, PDR of extended sextant biopsy was significantly higher than that of conventional sextant biopsy in the groups of PSA≤4 ng/mL, 〉4 and ≤10 ng/mL, 〉10 and ≤20 ng/mL and 〉20 and ≤30 ng/mL (P〈 0.05); and the PDR of two biopsies were similar in all the PSA〉30 ng/mL groups (P〉0.05). When all the cases are grouped according to TRUS images, the PDRs of normal, hypoechoic and hyperechoic/isoechoic groups were 23.1%, 60.3 % and 32. 1%, respectively. The PDR of the hypoechoic group was significantly higher than those of the other two groups ( P〈0.05). Fifty-four patients underwent repeated biopsy, and they were divided into benign group and malignant group according to the final pathological diagnosis. The detective rates of high grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasm (HGPIN) and atypical small acinar proliferation (ASAP) by the initial biopsy and the detective rate of new hypoechoic nodules by TRUS images were significantly higher in the malignant group than in the benign group (P〈0.05). Conclusion Extended sextant TRUS-guided transperineal prostate biopsy is safe and effective for prostate cancer diagnosis. Increase of biopsy cores is more significant for patients with low PSA level. Repeated biopsies are recommended for patients who are diagnosed as HGPIN or ASAP in initial biopsy or who have novel suspicious lesions as detected by TRUS images.
出处 《上海医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第7期508-511,共4页 Shanghai Medical Journal
关键词 前列腺活组织检查 前列腺癌 诊断 Prostate biopsy Prostate cancer Diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1HODGE K K, MCNEAL J E, TERRIS M K, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate[J].J Urol, 1989, 142(1): 71-75.
  • 2那彦群,孙光前.列腺癌诊断治疗指南//那彦群,孙光.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:49.
  • 3朱延军,徐志兵,徐叶青,杨念钦,杨渊峰,王国民.10点及以上与10点以下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检并发症的比较[J].老年医学与保健,2010,16(4):213-215. 被引量:4
  • 4SCATTONI V, ZLOTTA A, MONTIRONI R, et al. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2007, 52(5):1309-1322.
  • 5CHUN F K, EPSTEIN J I, FICARRA V, et al. Optimizing performance and interpretation of prostate biopsy: a critical analysis of the literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58(6): 851- 864.
  • 6PRESTI J C JR. Repeat prostate biopsy--when, where, and how[J].UrolOneol, 2009, 27(3): 312-314.
  • 7MOUSSA A S, JONES J S, YU C, et al. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting a positive repeat prostate biopsy in patients with a previous negative biopsy session in the era of extended prostate sampling[J]. BJU Int, 2010, 106(9): 1309-1314.
  • 8CAMPOS-FERNANDES J L, BASTIEN L, NICOLAIEW N, et al. Prostate cancer detection rate in patients with repeated extended 21-sample needle hiopsy[J]. Eur Urol, 2009, 55(3): 600-606.

二级参考文献10

  • 1那彦群,孙光.前列腺癌诊断治疗指南[M].中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南,北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:49.
  • 2Hedge KK, McNeal JE, Terns MK, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate [J]. J Urol, 1989,142 (1): 71-76.
  • 3Berger AP, Gozzi C, Stenner H, et al. Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a comparison among 3 protocols with 6,10 and 15 cores [J]. J Urol, 2004,171 (2): 1478-1481.
  • 4Kakelli Y, Naito S. Complication rates of ultrasound-guided biopsy: a nation-wide survey in lapan [J]. Int J Urol, 2008, 15 (4): 319-321.
  • 5Sieber PR, Rommel FM, Theodoran CG, et al. Contemporary ~ prostate biopsy complication rates in community-based urology practice [J]. Urology, 2007,70 (3): 498-500.
  • 6Koc G, Un S, Filiz DN, et al. Does Washing the biopsy needle with povidone-iodine have an effect on infection rates after transrectal prostate needle biopsy? [J]. Urol Int, 2010, May 5. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 7Hori S, Sengupta A, Joannides A, et al. Changing antibiotic prophylaxis for transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: are we putting our patients at risk? [J]. BJU Int, 2010, May 28. [Epub ahead of print].
  • 8Celibi I, Irer B, Kefi A, et al. Relationship between complications due to prostate biopsy and the scores of pain and discomfort [J]. Urol Int, 2004,72 (4): 303-307.
  • 9Iremashvili VV, Chepurov AK, Kobaladze KM, et al. Periprostatic local anesthesia with pudendal block for transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy: a randomized trial [J]. Urology, 2010,75 (5): 1023-1027.
  • 10朱延军,王国民,徐志兵,徐叶青.经直肠与超声引导下经会阴前列腺穿刺活检的比较[J].中国临床医学,2003,10(2):157-159. 被引量:13

共引文献3

同被引文献32

  • 1宋伟,金讯波,赵勇,王慕文,王金,李连军.经直肠超声引导下“13+X”点前列腺穿刺活检61例临床分析[J].泌尿外科杂志(电子版),2010,2(3):27-30. 被引量:2
  • 2徐叶青,郭剑明,朱延军,杨念钦,王一惟,王国民.不同PSA水平的国人首次前列腺穿刺活检所需穿刺针数的研究[J].肿瘤防治研究,2014,41(2):124-127. 被引量:10
  • 3吴荣佩,郑克立,李晓飞,钟婉媚.前列腺4区12点系统穿刺活检术诊断前列腺癌[J].中华男科学杂志,2004,10(7):493-495. 被引量:3
  • 4Siegel R, Ma J, Zou Z, et al. Cancer statistics ,2014 [ J ]. CA Cancer J Clin,2014,64( 1 ) :9-29. DOI: 10. 3322/caac. 21208.
  • 5Hodge KK, McNeal JE,Terris MK, et al. Random systematic versus directed ultrasound guided transrectal core biopsies of the prostate [ J ]. Urology, 1989,142 ( 1 ) :71-74.
  • 6Matlaga BR, Eskew LA, McCulloughDL. Prostate biopsy:indica- tions and technique [ J ]. Urology,2003,169 ( 1 ) : 12-19.
  • 7Ploussardy G, Nicolaiewy N, Marchand C, et al. Prospective evalua- tion of an extended 21-core biopsy scheme as initial prostate cancer diagnostic stategy [ J ]. European Urol OGY, 2014,65 ( 1 ) : 154- 161. DOI: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2012.05. 049.
  • 8梁磊,张彤,孟繁林,等.经会阴前列腺24针穿刺法对早期前列腺癌的诊断价值[J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版,2013,7(9):3832-3835.
  • 9Berger AP, Gozzi C, Steiner H, et al. Complication rate of transrec-tal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy : a comparison among 3 proto- cols with 6,10 and 15 cores[J]. Urology,2004,171 (4) :1478- 1480. DOI: I0. 1097/01. ju. 0000116449. 01186. t7.
  • 10Scattoni V, Zlotta A, Montironi R, et al. Extended and saturation prostatic biopsy in the diagnosis and eharacterisation of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature [ J ]. Eur Urol, 2007,52 (5) : 1309-1322. DOI: 10. 1016/j. eururo. 2007.08. 006.

引证文献2

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部