摘要
目的探讨6点与12点前列腺穿刺活组织检查诊断前列腺癌的差异。方法选择因血清总前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)〉4ng/mL、直肠指诊或前列腺B超检查提示前列腺癌可疑的患者300例,分别接受6点或12点前列腺穿刺活组织检查。患者年龄42~87岁,平均年龄为(68.4±2.1)岁。PSA水平为(20.7±1.7)ng/mL(0.9~128.3ng/mL),其中PSA〈4ng/mL13例,≥4且〈10ng/mL30例,≥10且≤20ng/mL158例,〉20ng/mL99例。前列腺体积13.4~178.5mL,平均体积为(63.4±3.5)mL。前列腺B超检查显示阴性211例,阳性89例;直肠指诊阴性207例,阳性93例。结果6点与12点前列腺穿刺活组织检查的阳性率分别为32.9%(50/152)和41.2%(61/148)。对于PsA≤20ng/mL、前列腺体积≥50mL、B超检查阴性的患者,12点穿刺活组织检查的阳性率显著高于6点法。在12点穿刺活组织检查阳性的病例中,有18例在传统6点穿刺未检测到癌组织,而在添加的6点中检测到。结论12点前列腺穿刺活组织检查比6点穿刺检出前列腺癌的阳性率更高,两种方法穿刺后并发症发生率的差异无统计学意义。
Objective To compare the outcomes of 6 o'clock and 12 o'clock position prostate biopsy cores for detecting prostate cancer. Methods A total of 300 patients with suspected prostate cancer (with abnormal digital rectal examination[DRE], abnormal prostate ultrasound or/and prostate specific antigen [PSA]〉 4.0 ng/mL) were included in the present study. They received transrectal ultrasound-guided 6 o'clock or 12 o'clock position prostate biopsies. The patients were aged 42- 87 years old, with a mean of (68.4±2.1 ) years. They had a PSA range of 0.9- 128.3 ng/mL and a mean of (20.7±1.7) ng/mL, with PSA〈4 ng/mL in 13 cases,4-10 ng/mL in 30 cases, 10-20 ng/mL 158 cases, and 〉20 ng/mL in 199 cases. The prostate volume was 13.4- 178.5 mL, with a mean of (63.4±3.5) mL. Prostate ultrasound results were negative in 211 cases and positive in 89 cases. DRE was negative in 207 cases and positive in 93 cases. Results The positive detection rate of 6 and 12 o'clock positions were 32.9% (50/152) and 41.2% (61/148), respectively. Eighteen cases who were positive in 12 o'clock position biopsy were negative in the traditional 6 o'clock position biopsy, but were positive in the additional 6 o'clock cores. Conclusion Compared with 6 o'clock core biopsy,the 12 o'clock core one can yield a higher positive rate, which is especially true when PSA≤20 ng/mL and when volume of prostate ≥50 mL. The incidences and duration of complications are similar between the 6 and 12 o' clock position biopsies.
出处
《上海医学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2011年第7期532-535,共4页
Shanghai Medical Journal