期刊文献+

杰斐逊共情量表(护生版)的编译及信效度检验 被引量:29

Translation and reliabifity, validity testing of JSE-HP ( nursing student edition)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的对中文版杰斐逊共情量表(护生版)进行编译,并对其应用过程中的信效度进行检验和测定。方法按照量表的跨文化适应程序对原版杰斐逊共情量表(护生版)进行翻译、回译、初试及预调查,形成正式中文版量表后,以国内五地六所高等护理院校的229名实习本科护生为调查对象,对量表的信、效度进行检验。结果中文版杰斐逊共情量表(护生版)的内部一致性系数Cronbach’sn值为0.836,折半信度为0.830,提取3个公因子后,累积贡献率为48.196%,3个维度的Cronbaeh’s仅值分别为0.866,0.767和0.705。各维度与问卷总分相关为0.613~0.872,各维度之间的相关为0.346~0.546。结论中文版杰斐逊共情量表(护生版)具有良好的信度和效度,可以作为一项有效测量工具,运用到我国护生群体中。 Objective To translate and test the reliability and validity of JSE-HP ( the Jefferson Scale of Empathy-Health Professionals ) (Nursing student edition ). Methods Original edition of JSE-HP was translated, back translated, first tested and pre-surveyed by cross-cuhural adaptation process. 229 practical nursing students from six advanced nursing schools coming from five places in China were surveyed after formal Chinese edition was formed, and reliability and validity of the scale was tested. Results Cronbach' sot of the scale was O. 836, split-half reliability was 0. 830, cumulative contribution rate was 48. 196% after three common factors was extracted, Cronbach' s ot of three dimensions were 0. 866, 0. 767 and 0. 705 respectively. Relationship between the dimensions and total score was in 0. 613 -0. 872, and relationship among all the dimensions were in 0. 346 -0.546. Conclusions JSE-Hp ( Chinese edition) ( Nursing student edition) had a good reliability and validity, and could be used as an effective assessing tools in nursing students in our country.
作者 李霞 孙宏玉
出处 《中华现代护理杂志》 2011年第24期2853-2856,共4页 Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing
关键词 杰斐逊共情量表 编译 信度 效度 检验 JSE-HP Translation Reliability Validity Test
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献10

  • 1侯文红,高娜.同理心应用于临床护理工作的研究进展[J].护理研究(上旬版),2005,19(9):1700-1701. 被引量:52
  • 2吴明隆.SPSS统计应用实务[M].北京:科学出版社,2003..
  • 3Titchener E. Elementary psychology of the thought processes[M]. New York : Macmillan, 1990 : 211 - 217.
  • 4Hojat M, Gonnella JS, Nasca TJ, et al. Physician empathy: Definition, measurement, and relationship to gender and specialty[J]. Am J Psychiatry. 2002,159 : 1563 - 1569.
  • 5Hojat M, Gonnella J S, Nasca T J, et al. The Jefferson scale of physician empathy:Further psychometric data and differences by gender and specialty at item level[J]. Acad Med ( supplement), 2002,77 : s57 - s60.
  • 6Spiro tiM. Mccrea Curren MG, Peschel E, et al. Empathy and the practice of medicine:Beyond pills and the scalpel[M].New Haven: Yale University Press, 1993:1.
  • 7Nightingale SD, Yarnold PR, Greenberg MS. Sympathy, empathy, and physician resource utilization[J] J Gen hater Med, 1991, 6:420 - 423.
  • 8Olsen JK. Relationship between nurse- expressed empathy, patient -perceived empathy and patient stress[J]. JN Scholarship, 1996, 27:317 -322.
  • 9杨辉,邱玉芳,宋丽萍.临床护理人员共情能力评价指标体系的初步研究[J].护理研究(下旬版),2007,21(11):3072-3074. 被引量:22
  • 10安胜利,陈平雁.量表的信度及其影响因素[J].中国临床心理学杂志,2001,9(4):315-318. 被引量:75

共引文献196

同被引文献299

引证文献29

二级引证文献150

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部