3Salameh Z, Ounsi HF, Aboushelib MN, et al. Fracture resistance and failure patterms of endodontically treated mandibular molars with and without glass fiber post in combination with a zirconiaceramic[J] .J Dent, 2008, 36(7) :513 - 519.
4Bateman G, R Iekettsdn, Saunderswp. Fibre2based post system s: a revie [J]. B r Dent J, 2003, 195 (1) : 43 - 48.
3DeCastro Albuquerque R,DeAbreu Polleto LT,et al.Stress analysis of an upper central incisor restored with different posts.J Oral Rehabil,2003,30:936-943.
4Ho MH,Lee SY,Chen HH,et al.Three-dimentsional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin.J Prosthet Dent,1994,72:367-372.
5Pegoretti A,Fambri L,Zappini G,et al.Finite element analysis of a glass fibre reinforced composite endodontic post.Biomaterials,2002,23:2667-2682.
6Raygot CG,Chai J,Jameson L.Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodonti-cally treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber-reinforced resin post system in vitro.Int J Prost hodont,2001,14:141-145.
8Gailleteau JG,RdAkin J.A comparison of intracanal stresses in a post-restored tooth utilizing the finite element emthod.J Endod,1992,18:540-544.
9Cormier CJ,Bums DR,Moon P.In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber,ceramic and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration.J Prosthodont,2001,10:26-36.
10Akkayan B,Gülmez T.Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored wih different post systems.J Prosthet Dent,2002,87:431-437.
