期刊文献+

基于认识论的案例教学法——美国商学院的经验 被引量:4

Case Method Based on Epistemology:Experience of American Business School
下载PDF
导出
摘要 案例教学是美国商学院重要的教学手段,以建构主义认识论为理论基础。本文以此认识论为基础,致力于探讨美国商学院案例教学中教师与学生的不同角色定位,倡导商学院教育应注重传授缄默知识,并具体分析了美国商学院案例教学对我国的借鉴意义。 Case method, which takes the structuralism epistemology as the theoretical base, is an important teaching and learning method in American business education. From the view of the epistemology, this paper investigates the roles of instructor and students in case method in busi- ness schools in the United States of America. This paper also suggests that business schools should pay more attention to teaching tacit knowledge. In addition, we explore the implications of our analyses for the improvement of business school education in China.
出处 《管理案例研究与评论》 2011年第4期323-329,共7页 Journal of Management Case Studies
关键词 案例教学 商学院 认识论 教师角色 学生角色 case method business school epistemology instructor's role students' role
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1刘刚.哈佛商学院案例教学作用机制及其启示[J].中国高教研究,2008(5):89-91. 被引量:174
  • 2Bloom A. The Closing of the American Mind [M]. New York: Simon and Schuster,1987.
  • 3Porter L W, McKibbin L E. Management Education and Development:Drift or Thrust into the 21st Century? [M]. New York:McGraw-Hill,1988.
  • 4Bailey J R. The case of the resurgent case[J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2002(2) :194.
  • 5Thompson K R. A conversation with Milton Blood: The new AACSB standards [J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education,2004(4) : 429-439.
  • 6萧瑞麟.不用数字的研究[M].台北:培生出版社,2006.
  • 7Piaget J. The Psychology of Intelligence [M]. New York: Routledge. 2001.
  • 8Polanyi M. Personal Knowledge:Towards a Post-critical Philosophy [M]. New York: Routledge, 1998.
  • 9Greiner L E, Bhambri A, Cummings T G. Searching for a strategy to teach strategy [J]. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2003 (4) : 402-420.
  • 10彭维刚.全球企业战略[M].孙卫,刘新梅,译.北京:中国邮电出版社,2008.

二级参考文献4

共引文献178

同被引文献31

  • 1Pfeffer j, Christina F. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye[J]. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2002,1 ( 1 ): 78.
  • 2明茨伯格.管理者而非MBA[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2006.
  • 3Sumantra G. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices[J]. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2005,4 (1):75-91.
  • 4Frederick T. The principles of scientific management[M]. New York: Harper,1911.
  • 5Henri F, Irwin G. General and industrial management[M]. Rev. ed. New York:Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineer,1984.
  • 6Freek V. On rigor and relevance:Fostering dialectic progress in management research[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2005,48 (6) : 978-982.
  • 7Buckley R, Ferris R, Bernardin J, et al. The discon-nect between the science and practice of management[J]. Business Horizons, 1998,41 (2):31-38.
  • 8Podolny M. The buck stop(and starts)at business school [J]. Harvard Business Review, 2009, 87 (6) :906-915.
  • 9Leavitt J. Education our MBAs:On teaching what we have not taught[J]. California Management Review, 1989,31(3) : 38-50.
  • 10马奇.马奇论管理[M].北京:东方出版社,2010.

引证文献4

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部