国内教材对“艺术起源于劳动”的论证问题

The Argumentation of Art Originating in Labor in Domestic Textbooks

国内高校文学理论教科书在艺术起源问题上坚持艺术起源于劳动的观点本是无可非议的,但是其论证上却存在问题:有意无意地或暗示性地把并未研究过人类艺术起源课题的马克思恩格斯拉进这个课题的研究者队伍中来;因为普列汉诺夫是马克思主义者,便将并非属于他的独家之言的艺术起源于劳动定为马克思主义文艺学观点;强扭马克思恩格斯等人的话语作为论据;"为我所需"地选用理论资料与原始艺术资料;有意无意地表露出"终极真理"意识等等。

It is not unacceptable that many textbooks on literary theories used in domestic colleges and universities maintain that art originates in labor as regards the origin of art.Their argumentation of the point,however,is problematic.The present article focuses on five of the popular practices in this connection: Marks and Engels,who had never studied the subject of the origin of art,have been involved in the study force consciously or unconsciously or by means of implication;since Plekhanov was a Marxist,the view of art originating in labor,which was not held by him alone,has been classified as one of the Marxist artistic thoughts;remarks by Marks,Engels,and others have been stretched as part of the proof;the theoretical data and those of the original art are chosen 'to serve my purposes';the idea of ultimate truth is alluded to consciously or unconsciously.