期刊文献+

基于层叠条件随机场的事件因果关系抽取 被引量:20

Event Causal Relation Extraction Based on Cascaded Conditional Random Fields
原文传递
导出
摘要 传统的事件因果关系抽取方法只能覆盖文本中的部分显式因果关系.针对这种不足,提出一种基于层叠条件随机场模型的事件因果关系抽取方法.该方法将事件因果关系的抽取问题转化为对事件序列的标注问题,采用层叠(两层)条件随机场标注出事件之间的因果关系.第一层条件随机场模型用于标注事件在因果关系中的语义角色,标注结果传递给第二层条件随机场模型用于识别因果关系的边界.实验表明,本文方法不仅可以覆盖文本中的各类显式因果关系,并且均能取得较好的抽取效果,总体抽取效果的F1值达到85.3%. Traditional methods for event causal relation extraction covered only part of the explicit causal relation in the text. A method for event causal relation extraction is presented based on Cascaded Conditional Random Fields. The method casts the problem of event causal relation extraction as the labeling of event sequence. The Cascaded (Dual-layer) Conditional Random Fields is employed to label the causal relation of event sequence. The first layer of the Cascaded Conditional Random Fields model is used to label the semantic role of causal relation of the events, and then the output of the first layer is passed to the second layer for labeling the boundaries of the event causal relation. Experimental results show that this method not only covers each class of explicit event causal relation in the text, but also achieves good performance and the F-Measure of the overall performance arrives at 85.3%.
出处 《模式识别与人工智能》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期567-573,共7页 Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.60975033) 上海市重点学科开放课题项目(No.J50103)资助
关键词 事件因果关系 事件序列 层叠条件随机场 条件随机场模型 Event Causal Relation, Event Sequence, Cascaded Conditional Random Fields, CRFs
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1刘宗田,黄美丽,周文,仲兆满,付剑锋,单建芳,智慧来.面向事件的本体研究[J].计算机科学,2009,36(11):189-192. 被引量:94
  • 2Ahn D. The Stages of Event Extraction//Proc of the COLING-ACL Workshop on Annotating and Reasoning about Time and Events. Sydney, Australia, 2006 : 1 - 8.
  • 3Surdeanu M, Harabagiu S, Williams J, et al. Using Predicate-Argu- ment Structures for Information Extraction//Proc of the 41st Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics. Sapporo, Japan, 2003:8-15.
  • 4Girju R. Automatic Detection of Causal Relations for Question Answering// Proc of the 41 st ACL Workshop on Multilingual Summarization and Question Answering. Sapporo, Japan, 2003:76 -83.
  • 5Filatova E, Hatzivassiloglou V. Event-Based Extractive Summarization // Proc of ACL Workshop on Summarization. Barcelona, Soain, 2004:104-111.
  • 6Pechsiri C, Kawtrakul A. Mining Causality from Texts for Question Answering System. IEICE Trans on Information and Systems, 2007, 90(10) : 1523 -1533.
  • 7Khoo C, Kornfilt J, Oddy R, et al. Automatic Extraction of Cause- Effect Information from Newspaper Text without Knowledge-Based Inferencing. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 1998, 13(4) : 177- 186.
  • 8Joskowicz L, Ksiezyck T, Grishman R. Deep Domain Models for Discourse Analysis//Proc of the Annual AI Systems in Government Conference. Washington D C, USA, 1989:195 -200.
  • 9Kaplan R, Berry-Rogghe G. Knowledge-Based Acquisition of Causal Relationships in Text. Knowledge Acquisition, 1991,3 (3) : 317 - 337.
  • 10干红华,潘云鹤.一种基于事件的因果关系的结构分析方法[J].模式识别与人工智能,2003,16(1):56-62. 被引量:9

二级参考文献43

共引文献98

同被引文献101

引证文献20

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部