匹多莫德口服与雾化吸入对反复呼吸道感染的疗效比较

目的观察药物注射或雾化吸入治疗反复呼吸道感染临床效果对比情况。方法反复呼吸道感染患者40例平分为两组:治疗组与对照组各20例,在综合治疗的基础上,对照组加用匹多莫德口服治疗,治疗组加用匹多莫德雾化吸入治疗。结果经过治疗后,治疗组20例痊愈8例,显效10例,有效2例,无效0例,总有效率为100.0%;对照组20例痊愈7例,显效5例,有效4例,无效4例,总有效率为80.0%,治疗组的临床疗效明显好于对照组(P<0.05)。结论通过驱动雾化吸入匹多莫德治疗反复呼吸道感染可取得理想效果,提示雾化吸入可作为一种有效的途径应用于治疗呼吸系统疾病方面。

Objective Observation medicine injection or atomization inspiration treatment repeatedly respiratory infections clinical effect contrast situation. Methods The respiratory infections patient 40 example equal divisions are repeatedly two group of-treatment groups and control group each 20 examples, in complex therapy＇s foundation, the control group adds with Morde takes orally the treatment, treatment group Canada atomizes the inspiration treatment with Morde. Results After process treatment, the treatment group 20 examples convalesce 8 examples, shows results 10 examples, the effective 2 examples, the invalid 0 examples, the total effectiveness is 100.0%; The control group 20 examples convalesce 7 examples, shows results 5 examples, the effective 4 examples, the invalid 4 examples, the total effectiveness is 80.0%, treatment group＇s clinical curative effect obvious good in control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Treats the respiratory infections through actuation atomization inspiration Morde to be possible to make the ideal progress repeatedly, prompts the atomization inspiration to be possible to take one effective way to apply in the treatment respiratory disorder aspect.