期刊文献+

Beagle犬腹腔镜活体供肾-移植模型的建立 被引量:3

Establishment of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy-transplantation model in beagle canine
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨Beagle犬腹腔镜活体供肾一移植模型建立的安全性和可行性。方法8条beagle犬随机分为两组,实验组行腹腔镜左肾供肾切取术,对照组行开放左肾供肾切取术,两组分别行组内同种异体肾移植术并置于左侧髂窝,同时切除自体右肾。统计两组取肾手术时间、术中失血量、热缺血时间、切口长度,肾移植手术时间、术中失血量、供肾动静脉吻合时间等手术指标及术后实验犬肌酐、尿素氮变化情况。结果实验组腹腔镜供肾切取术均成功完成,无一例中转开腹,其中供肾切取手术时间(61.5±11.0)min,术中失血量(13.9±6.8)ml,供肾热缺血时间(81.4±9.3)S;对照组开放供肾切取术,无一例失败,其中供肾切取手术时间(66.1±13.5)min,术中失血量(32.7±4.8)ml,供肾热缺血时间(28.5±5.6)s;8例次同种异体肾移植术,全部成功,受体移植手术时间(87,3±13.9)min,术中失血量(13.5±5.2)ml,动脉吻合时间(19.8±6.7)min,静脉吻合时间(22.8±3.5)min,术后1个月观察期间内,无漏尿、出血、感染等并发症发生,术后第3天实验犬肌酐、尿素氮指标恢复正常。结论Beagle犬腹腔镜活体供肾.移植模型的建立操作相对简便、容易掌握,成活率高,安全、可靠。 Objective To detect the safety and feasibility of the laparoscopic live donor nephrecto- my-transplantation model in beagle canine. Methods 8 beagle dogs were randomly divided into two groups : the experimental group of laparoscopic nephrectomy for the left kidney, and the control group with open nephrectomy. In the 2 groups, all kidneys were placed in the left side of the iliac fossa, and all the right kidneys were removed at the same time. The operation time, blood loss,warm ischemia time,length of incision, the time of renal arteriovenous anastomosis,the blood creatinine and urea nitrogen levels after op- eration were monitored. Results The laparoscopic donor nephrectomy were performed successfully in the experimental group with the average nephrectomy time (61.5 ± 11. 0) min,blood loss (13.9 ± 6. 8) ml,renal warm ischemia time (81.4 ± 9. 3 ) s; The open nephrectomy were performed successfully in the control group with the average nephrectomy operative time (66. 1 ± 13.5) min,blood loss (32. 7 ±4. 8) ml,renal warm ischemia time ( 28.5 ± 5.6 ) s ; All the surgeries of kidney transplantation were successful with average operation time (87. 3 ± 13.9) min, blood loss (13.5 ± 5.2 ) ml, arterial anastomosis time (19. 8 ± 6. 7 ) min, venous anastomosis time ( 22. 8 ± 3.5 ) min. After 1 month of observation period, no leakage of urine,bleeding, infection or other complications were occurred. Three days after surgery, the creatinine and urea nitrogen recovered to normal. Conclusion Beagle canine laparoscopic live donor kidney-transplantation model is simple and practicable with high survival rate.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第9期1591-1593,共3页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
关键词 腹腔镜 活体供肾 肾移植 BEAGLE犬 动物模型 Laparoseopy Living donor kidney Kidney transplantation Beagle canine Animal model
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Iaria M, Capocasale E, Dalla Valle R, et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy. An appraisal on surgical outcome and post-opera- tive course. Ann Ital Chir, 2009,80:449-451.
  • 2Greco F, Hoda MR, Alcaraz A, et al. Laparoscopic living-donor ne- phrectomy : analysis of the existing literature. Eur Urol,2010 ,58 :498- 509.
  • 3王玉杰,刘明,安恒庆.一种改进的大鼠肾移植模型[J].中华实验外科杂志,2007,24(5):631-632. 被引量:7
  • 4刘忠国,温端改,潘浩,欧阳骏,王祖峰.改良性大鼠同种异体肾移植模型的建立[J].中华实验外科杂志,2007,24(6):756-756. 被引量:7
  • 5朱晓明,熊汝成,张元芳,张永康.改进的犬异体肾移植术[J].上海实验动物科学,1994,14(2):90-92. 被引量:6
  • 6刘运忠,龚宝勇,罗甜仪,陈召威,王春华,林振华,夏云锋,梁金强.Beagle犬的基础数据[J].中国比较医学杂志,2009,19(3):60-63. 被引量:11
  • 7原春辉,刘永锋,程颖,李桂臣,赵宁,梁健,何三光.黄芪在犬肾离体灌注保存中的作用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2003,20(2):151-152. 被引量:3
  • 8Hanto DW, Maki T, Yoon MH, et al. Intraoperative administration of inhaled carbon monoxide reduces delayed graft function in kidney al- lografts in Swine. Am J Transplant,2010,10:2421-2430.
  • 9Azuma H, Isaka Y, Nomi H, et al. Induction of donor-specific toler- ance using superagonistic CD28 antibody in rat renal allografts:regu- latory T-cell expansion before engraftment may be important. Trans- plantation, 2010,90 : 1328 -1335.
  • 10Minnee RC, Idu MM. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Neth J Med, 2010,68 : 199-206.

二级参考文献39

共引文献35

同被引文献25

  • 1邢军,许评,周毅,陈艳波,李爱东,宋纯,宋春芳.一种提高犬胰岛体外培养质量的方法[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(4):565-566. 被引量:1
  • 2郝振华,张群华,石伟,孙兵.糖尿病小鼠胰岛移植部位的实验研究[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(5):612-613. 被引量:11
  • 3Ono Y, Kinukawa T, Hattori R, et al. The long-term outcome of la-praroscopic radical nephrectomy for small renal cell carcinoma [J]. JUrol,2001, 165(6 Pt 1) : 1867- 1870.
  • 4Gill IS, Meraney AM, Schweizer DK, et al. Laparoscopic radical ne-phrectomy in 100 patients : a single center experience from the UnitedStates[J]. Cancer,2001, 92(7):1843-1855.
  • 5Jeon SH, Kwon TG, Rha KH, et al. Comparison of laparoscopicversus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors : a retro-spective analysis of multi-center results[J]. BJU Int, 2011,107(5): 817-821.
  • 6Dunn MD,Portis AJ,Shalhav AL,et al. Laparoscopic versus open radi-cal nephrectomy : a 9-year experience [J]. J Urol,2000,164 (4 ):1153-1159.
  • 7Gill IS,Schweizer DK,Hobart MG,et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopicradical nephrectomy : the Cleveland clinic experience [J]. J Urol,2000,163(6) :1665-1670.
  • 8Kwon SY, Jung JW, Kim BS, et al. Laparoscopic versus openradical nephrectomy in T2 renal cell carcinoma : long-term oncolog-ic outcomes[J]. Korean J Urol,2011,52(7) : 474-478.
  • 9Bolleus R,Mikhaski D,Espinoza BP,et al.Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy:a new technique to maximize the length of the renal vein using a modified Endo GIA stapler[J].Eur Urol,2007,51 (5):t326-1331.
  • 10Alcocer F,Zazueta E,Montes de Oca J,et al.The superficial femoral vein:a valuable conduit for a short renal vein in kidney transplantation[J].Transplant Proc,2009,41 (5):1963-1965.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部