期刊文献+

促销伤害危机应对方式对消费者信任和感知风险的影响研究——基于连锁超市的实证 被引量:2

The Effect of Coping Styles in Promotion Injury Crisis upon Consumer Trust and Perceived Risk——An Experimental Study on Chain Supermarkets
下载PDF
导出
摘要 应用实验法,通过研究不同应对方式下消费者品牌信任和感知风险的变化,得到不同促销伤害危机发生后修复与消费者关系的最佳应对方式。研究结果表明,无论是在促销人身伤害危机还是在促销财务伤害危机中,积极承担责任并致歉的应对方式下消费者的品牌信任最高而感知风险最低,是最佳的危机应对方式。 This paper, applying experimental method, studies the changes of consumer trust and perceived risk when different coping styles are adopted so that the optimal coping styles are found to deal with different promotion injury crises. The study suggests that under both promotion personal injury condition and promotion property injury condition, taking responsibility with active apology is the best countermeasure, and only with which, would consumers get the lowest perceived risk and highest brand trust.
作者 花海燕 李蔚
出处 《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2011年第2期52-57,共6页 Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
关键词 促销伤害危机 应对方式 品牌信任 感知风险 promotion injury crisis coping style brand trust perceived risk
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1TYLER L.Liability Means Never Being able to Say You' re Sorry:Corporate Quilt,Legal Constraints,and Defensiveness in Corporate Communication[J].Management Communication Quarterly,1997,11 (1):51 -73.
  • 2COOMBS W T,HOLLADAY S J.Communication and attributions in a crisis:An experimental study in crisis communication[J].Journal of Public Relations ReSearch,1996,13(4):321-340.
  • 3BENOIT W L.Image repair discourse and crisis communication[J].Public Relations Review,1997(23):177 -186.
  • 4COOMBS W T.An analytic framework for crisis situations:Better response from a better understanding of the situation[J].Journal of Public Relation Research,1998,10(2):177-191.
  • 5COOMBS W T.Information and compassion in crisis response' s test of their effects[J].Journal of Public Relations Research,1999,11(2):125-142.
  • 6PEARSON C M,CLAIR J A.Reframing crisis management[J].Academy of Management Review,1998,23(1):59-76.
  • 7WEINER B.An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion[J].Psychology Review,1985(92):548-573.
  • 8KAPLAN L B,SZYBILLO G J,JACOBY J.Components of Perceived Risk in Product Purchase:A Cross-Validation[J].Journal of Applied Psychology,1974,59(3):287-291.
  • 9方正.产品伤害危机应对方式对顾客感知危险的影响——基于中国消费者的实证研究[J].经济体制改革,2007(3):173-176. 被引量:39
  • 10McAllister D.Affect-and cognition-based trust as foundations for inter-personal cooperation in organizations[J].Academy of Management Journal,1995(38):24-59.

二级参考文献14

  • 1杨小丹.麦当劳中国称薯条不合反式脂肪酸[N].北京娱乐信报,2006—02—13.
  • 2徐曼.质检总局:我国不粘锅无毒[N].北京青年报,2004—10—14.
  • 3刘迪.高露洁高调召开新闻发布会牙膏致癌事件落幕[N].新闻晨报,2005—04—28.
  • 4徐惠芬,张源.饮料工业协会首度回应软饮料含苯量无损健康[N].深圳晚报,2006—03—08.
  • 5Siomkos, George J, Kurzbard, Gary (1994), The Hidden Crisis in Product- harm Crisis management, European Journal of Marketing, (2) : 30 -41.
  • 6王晓玉,吴纪元,晁钢令.产品伤害危机及其处理过程对消费者考虑集的影响—基于中国消费者的实证分析[C].中国营销科学学术会议论文集,2005.230—241.
  • 7Niraj Dawar, Madan M. Pillufla (2000), Impact of Product-harm Crisis on Brand Equity: the Moderating Role of Consumer Expectations, Journal of Marketing Research, (5) : 215 - 226.
  • 8Hovland, C. I. , Lumsdaine, A. A. , & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Studies in social psychology in World War Ⅱ(Vol. Ⅲ). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. (pp. 247 -248,256,260 -261).
  • 9Olson, J. M., & Cal, A. V. (1984). Source credibility, attitudes, and the recall of past behaviours. European Journal of Social Psychology, 14,203 -210. (p. 252).
  • 10Olson, J. M., Roese, N. J., & Zanna, M. P. (1996). Expectancies. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford Press, pp. 211-238. (p. 124).

共引文献38

同被引文献16

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部