议题与空间:罗尔斯与哈贝马斯之间的一场误会被引量：6

Issue and Space:A Misunderstanding between Rawls and Habermas

导出

摘要罗尔斯所强调的政治领域与哈贝马斯所主张的公共领域之间的关系,构成了二人理论争论中最独特且最持久的方面,并深刻影响着当代慎议民主理论的构造。但这两个领域之间被设定的冲突其实是二人之间的一场误会,因为前者是一种议题,后者是一种空间。作为议题的政治领域可以成为公共领域政治商谈的对象,而原初状态与公共理性仅仅是针对这一特殊议题的特殊约束。我们在两位理论家对公共领域所提出的约束条件之间的取舍,取决于是把合法性还是正义作为公共领域的目标。罗尔斯为设计正义原则所设置的约束条件塑造了一种公共推理形式,从而也构造了一种慎议民主的模式。 The relation between the domain of the political focused by Rawls and the public sphere advocated by Habermas is the most distinguishable and persistent aspect in the disputes of the two theorists,and it profoundly influences the theoretical construction of contemporary deliberative democracy. But the presumed conflict between these two domains arises from a misunderstanding between Rawls and Habermas,because the former is an issue whereas the latter is a space.The domain of the political as an issue may act as an object of the political discourses in the public sphere,and the original position and public reason are merely special constraints against this special issue.Our choice between the constraints proposed for the public sphere by these two theorists depends on which is to be taken as the goal of this sphere,legitimacy or justice.Nevertheless,the constraints set by Rawls for the design of the principles of justice model a form of public reasoning,and eventually shape a pattern of deliberative democracy.

作者谭安奎

机构地区中山大学政治与公共事务学院

出处《中国人民大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2010年第6期93-100,共8页 Journal of Renmin University of China

基金中山大学青年教师培育项目"当代契约主义的慎议民主理论探究"阶段性成果

关键词政治领域公共领域议题空间慎议民主 the domain of the political public sphere issue space deliberative democracy

分类号 D0 [政治法律—政治学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献19

1Seyla Benhabib. "Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy", in Fred D' Agostino and Gerald F. Gaus (ed.). Public Reason. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company, 1998.
2David Hollenbach . "Contexts of Political Role of Religion: Civil Society and Culture", in Paul J. Weithman (ed.) . Reasonable Pluralism. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc. , 1999.
3John Rawls. Political Liberalism. 2nd. , New York: Columbia University Press, 1996.
4哈贝马斯:《在事实与规范之间:关于法律和民主法治国的商谈理论》,北京,生活·读书·新知三联书店,2003.
5John Rawls. "The Domain of the Political and Overlapping Consensus", in his Collected Papers, ed. by Samuel Freeman. Cambridge Mass. Harvard University Press, 1999.
6John Rawls. "The Idea of Public Reason Revisited" . The University of Chicago Law Review, Vol. 64, No. 3, Summer, 1997.
7Jurgen Habermas. "Reconciliation through the Public Use of Reason: Remarks on John Rawls's Political Liberalism" . The Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 92, No. 3, Mar. , 1995.
8Martha C. Nussbaum . "Rawls and Feminism", in Samuel Freeman (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Rawls. Cambridge.. Cambridge University Press, 2003.
9Jtirgen Habermas. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action. translated by Christian Lenhardt and Shierry Weber Nicholsen. Cambridge, Mass... The MIT Press, 1990.
10Thomas McCarthy. "Kantian Constructivism and Reconstructivism: Rawls and Habermas in Dialogue " . Ethics, Vol. 105, No. 1, Oct. 1994.