责任保险第三人直接诉讼法律适用国际比较研究——从法律选择方法的价值目标及其实现路径的维度

An International Comparison of Approaches towards Determining Applicable Laws to Third Party′s Direct Action against the Insurer of the Person Liable——In Terms of the Value Goal of the Choice of Law and Its Way of Realization

分析比较直接诉讼法律适用的欧美方法,指出其共同的价值目标是追求实体法正义,但实现实体法正义的路径各不相同。结合我国的现实背景,指出我国应采用反映支持直接诉讼的实体法政策目标的法律选择方法处理涉外直接诉讼案件,建议修改《涉外民事关系法律适用法》,参照欧洲做法规定有关直接诉讼的结果导向冲突规则,或参照美国做法就最密切联系原则的适用确定反映实体法正义目标的必要指引。

On analyzing and comparing the different approaches applied in Europe and America in deciding the law applicable to direct action, the paper pointed out that pursuing the substantive justice was their common value goal, but the way they employed to achieve substantive justice vary. Considering the reality of China, the paper suggested that China should adopt the method in favor of direct action in the choice of law for settling foreign-related lawsuits. It proposed that ＂The Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People＇s Republic of China＂ should be amended, either with reference to ＂Rome Ⅱ＂ , to establish the result-selective rules, or with reference to ＂American restatement Ⅱ＂, to provide necessary direction for determining the significant contact site.