期刊文献+

结合约束满足消除误判的等价性验证方法

Using constraint satisfaction to eliminate false negative in equivalence checking
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通过对集成电路等价性验证方法中消除误判方法的研究,给出一种结合约束满足消除误判的方法。提出消除误判约束关系的概念,当等价性验证可能存在误判现象时,调用约束求解器对消除误判约束关系进行求解,进而消除误判。本方法不用借助其他辅助的数据结构、相应约束关系或启发式策略,极大地降低了等价性验证的复杂度。本方法还适用于不同抽象层次间等价性验证方法中误判的消除,可以消除系统级模型和寄存器传输级等价性验证方法中存在的误判。 The introduction of cut-point is a breakthrough in Formal equivalence checking method.However,the method using cut-point is incomplete and may bring false-negative.Based on the study of false negative elimination in IC equivalence checking,we proposed a false positive elimination method using the constraint satisfaction technique.The concept of false negative elimination constraints was put forward.When the equivalence checking problem possibly runs into false negative,the constraint solver is called to solve the false positive elimination constraints,thus,the false positive is eliminated.The proposed method does not rely on the assistant data structures,the constraints or the heuristic policy.Therefore,the complexity of the equivalence checking is greatly reduced.The method is also applicable to the false negative elimination in the equivalence checking between different Abstraction levels,and between system-level models and register transfer levels.
出处 《吉林大学学报(工学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第5期1374-1377,共4页 Journal of Jilin University:Engineering and Technology Edition
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(60973089 60873148 60773097 61003101) 吉林省科技发展计划项目(20101501 20100185 20090108 20080107 201101039) 高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金项目(20100061110031) 浙江师范大学计算机软件与理论省级重中之重学科开放基金项目 浙江省自然科学基金项目(Y1100191) 欧盟合作项目(155776-EM-1-2009-1-IT-ERAMUNDUS-ECW-L12) 吉大学符号计算与知识工程教育部重点实验室开放项目(93K-17-2009-K05) 吉林大学研究生创新基金项目(20080242 20101026)
关键词 人工智能 集成电路 等价性验证 割集 artificial intelligence integrated circuit equivalence checking cut point
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Huang Shi-yu, Cheng Kwang-ting. Formal Equiva- lence Checking and Design Debugging[M]. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1998.
  • 2Matsunaga T. An efficient equivalence checker for combinatorial circuits[C]//Proceedings of the 33th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, Las Vegas, 1996.
  • 3Reddy S M, Kunz W, Pradhan D K. Novel verifica- tion framework combining structural and OBDD methods in a synthesis environment[C] // Proceed- ings of the 32th ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference, San Francisco, 1995.
  • 4Jain J, Narayan A, Fujita M, et al. Formal verifica- tion of combinational circuits [C] // Proceedings of International Conference on VLSI Design, Hydera- bad, 1997.
  • 5Kuehlmann A, Krohm F. Equivalence checking u- sing cuts and heaps[C]//Proceedings of 34th Design Automation Conference, New York, USA,1997.
  • 6Hu A J, High-level vs. RTL combinational equiva- lence: an introduction[C]//Proceedings of Interna- tional Conference on Computer Design, Las vegas, 2006.
  • 7Koelbl A, Lu Y, Mathur A. Embedded tutorial: Formal equivalence checking between system level models and RTL[C]// Proceedings of International Conference on Computer-Aided Design, California, 2005.
  • 8张立明,赵剑,赵相福,欧阳丹彤,白岩.基于因果关系的模型诊断[J].吉林大学学报(工学版),2009,39(4):1052-1056. 被引量:9

二级参考文献4

共引文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部