摘要
A.罗森伯格对经济学在认知地位上的两重性或两难困境有深刻的认识。一方面,经济学很像标准的科学理论,同时经济学定律本应有资格成为科学定律。罗森伯格认为,基于统一科学理想,并追寻自然过程的自动平衡的机理,在典型科学理论(牛顿力学与达尔文自然选择学说)和在经济学中同样取得极大成功。然而另一方面,经济学在预测力上却远为逊色。为了破解这一两难,罗森伯格把预测失败的症结归咎为人类行为所特有的"意向性"。换句话说,经济学毕竟与自然科学不同,它与其他社会科学拥有对信念-行动-欲望的意向性解释框架的承诺。
Alexander Rosenberg has a deep understanding and research on the dilemma duality of the cognitive status of economics. On the one hand, like a standard scientific theory, the law and theory of economics should be eligible to become the law of science. Rosenberg proposed,based on the ideal of unified science,that the pursuit of natural processes＇ self- balancing mechanism has great success in the field of typical scientific theory as Newtonian mechanics and Darwinian natural selection theory, and also in the field of economies. But on the other hand, the predictive power of economics is much less than that of science. To solve this dilemma duality, Rosenberg attributes the failure of economics＇ predictive power to the special features of human behavior as intentionality. In other words,economics and natural sciences, after all,are different. Economics and other social sciences have a common feature, that is,they have commitment on the interpretative frame of intentionality（ Belief - Action - Desire）.
出处
《经济评论》
CSSCI
北大核心
2011年第5期5-11,共7页
Economic Review
基金
重庆大学“中央高校基本科研业务费”项目“话语分析与经济学修辞学研究”(项目编号:CDJSK100036)的资助
国家社会科学基金项目“经济逻辑研究”(项目编号:06BZX050)的资助
关键词
经济学方法论
致极策略
BAD意向性解释
Economic Methodology
Extremal Strategy
Interpretative Frame of Intentionality （ Belief - Action - Desire）
