期刊文献+

不同理论视角下的翻译质量评估之评析 被引量:1

A Critical Review of Multi-theoretic Perspectives on Translation Quality Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 近年来,人们对提出解决评估翻译质量的问题的标准兴趣日浓,产生了关注翻译特性及翻译过程中用到的技术和程序的诸多研究,也一直尝试构建翻译质量评估模式。这些模式(语言、心理、文化、社会)既有宏观分析焦点,也有微观分析焦点,既考察单个语言项目的交际价值,也考虑意识形态、功能、语类、语域、语篇等因素,翻译评论家通过此多元视角可大致重构译者的选择,尽可能客观地揭示译者的决定过程。 In recent years there has been increasing interest in developing the criteria for solving the problems of assessing the quality of translation,which has resulted in many studies concerning the nature of translation,the techniques and procedures used in the translation process.There have also been attempts to build models for assessing translation quality.These models(linguistic,mentalist,cultural and social),with both a macro-analytical focus and a micro-analytical one,take into consideration such factors as ideology,function,genre,register,text as well as the communicative value of individual linguistic items.Such a multi-perspectival viewpoint enables a translation critic to give a probabilistic reconstruction of the translator’s choices,and throw some light on his or her decision processes in an manner as objective as possible.
作者 唐韧
出处 《宁波大学学报(人文科学版)》 2011年第5期40-44,共5页 Journal of Ningbo University:Liberal Arts Edition
关键词 翻译质量评估 标准 翻译过程 宏观分析焦点 微观分析焦点 translation quality assessment criteria translation process macro-analytical focus micro-analytical focus
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1NIDA E. Toward a Science of Translating[M]. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1964.
  • 2NORD C. Scopos, loyalty and translational conventions[J]. Target, 1991, 3 ( 1 ) : 91-109.
  • 3NORD C. Text Analysis in Translation: Theory, Methodology, and Didactic Application of a Model for Translation-Oriented Text Analysis[M]. Amsterdam and Atlanta: Rodopi, 1991: 166.
  • 4TOURY G. Descriptive Translation Studies and Beyond[M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1995.
  • 5VENUTi L. The Translator's Invisibility: A History of Translation[M]. London: Routledge, 1995.
  • 6CATFORD J C. A Linguistic Theory of Translation: An Essay in Applied Linguistics[M]. Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1965.
  • 7I REISS K. M-glichkeiten und Grenzen der Obersetzungskritik [M], Munich: M. Hoeber, 1981.
  • 8WILLS W. Ubersetzungswissenschaft. Prableme und Methoden[M]. Stuttgart: E. Klett, 1977.
  • 9BAKER M. In Other Words: A Coursebook on Translation[M]. London/New York: Routledge, 1992.
  • 10HATIM B, MASON I. The Translator as Communicator[M]. London: Routledge, 1997.

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部