期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

决策任务反应模式对偏好反转的影响 被引量：3

THE IMPACT OF DECISION-MAKING TASK RESPONSE MODEL ON PREFERENCE REVERSAL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在经典彩票问题研究的基础上,探讨了匹配和选择两种反应模式及其先后顺序对被试偏好反转的影响,以及被试性别与其偏好反转的关系。研究结果发现:(1)反应模式的变化导致偏好反转的发生;(2)偏好反转存在反应顺序效应,先匹配后选择条件下的偏好反转率显著大于先选择后匹配条件下的偏好反转率;研究结果不支持后悔理论;(3)不同性别被试在选择和匹配任务中的偏好及其反转率没有显著性差异。 The present study explored the impact of response models （choosing and matching） and their order on preference reversal. The present study also explored the relation between subjects＇ gender and their preference reversal. The study found that： （1） It appeared preference reversal phenomenon when the two response models were changed. （2） There existed response order effect on preference reversal, preference reversal ratio in this decision model （matching-first and choosing-second） was significantly bigger than another decision model （choosing-first and matching-second） . The result didn＇t support regret theory. （3） There was no significant difference between male and female subjects＇ preference and their reversal ratio in different response models （choosing and matching） .
作者 常光伟 王青春 阴国恩
机构地区 天津师范大学心理与行为研究院
出处 《心理与行为研究》 CSSCI 2011年第3期176-180,共5页 Studies of Psychology and Behavior
基金 天津市教育科学"十一五"规划重点课题(ZZG193)的资助
关键词 反应模式 选择 匹配 偏好反转 决策任务. response model, choosing, matching, preference reversal, decision-making task.
分类号 B842.5 [哲学宗教—基础心理学]
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Slovic P. The construction of preference. American Psychologist, 1995, 50:364-371.
  • 2Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions.Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89:46-55.
  • 3Slovic P, Griffin D, Tversky A. Compatibility Effects in Judgment and Choice//Hogarth R M. Insights in Decision Making: Theory and Applications. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1990.
  • 4Highhouse S. Context-Dependent selection:The effects of decoy and phantom job candidates. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processesg, 1996, 65 (1) : 68-76.
  • 5HseeC K, Zhang J, Chen J S. Internal and substantive tencies in decision-making//Koelher D, Harvey N. Blackwell Handbook of Judgment and Decision-making. Oxford, England: Blackwell, 2004.
  • 6Wong, K F E, Kwong J Y Y. Comparing two tiny giants or two huge dwarfs? Preference reversals owing to number size framing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005, 98:54-65.
  • 7Irwin J R, Baron J. Response mode effects and moral values Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2001 84:177-197.
  • 8Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A. The simulation heuristic//Kahnernan D, Slovic P, Tversky A. Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982:201-208.
  • 9Loomes G, Sugden R. Regret theory: An alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Economic Journal. 1982, 92: 805-824.
  • 10张玲.风险任务特征与偏好反转的实验研究[J].人类工效学,1999,5(2):9-12. 被引量：5

二级参考文献10

  • 1张玲.偏好反转的兼容性假设的实验研究[J].应用心理学,1998,4(2):28-32. 被引量：2
  • 2张玲.风险任务特征与偏好反转的实验研究[J].人类工效学,1999,5(2):9-12. 被引量：5
  • 3李艾丽莎,张庆林.决策的选择偏好研究述评[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):618-624. 被引量：19
  • 4Lichtensten S,Slovic.Preverbal of Preference between Bids and Choice in Grambling Decision.Journal of Experimental Psychology,1971.
  • 5Grether DM,Plott CR,Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon.The American Economical Review,1979.
  • 6Pommerehne W W,Schneider F,Zweifel P Economic Theory of Choice and the Preference Reversal Phenomenon.A Reexamination.The American Economical Review,1982.
  • 7Tversky A,Slovic P,Kahneman D.The Causes of Preference Reversal.The American Economical Review,1990.
  • 8Rajneesh Suri,Kent B.Monroe.The Effects of Time Constraints on Consumers' Judgments of Prices and Products.Journal of Consumer Research,June 2003,Vol.30.
  • 9Shayne Galloway.Experience and Medical Decision-Making in Outdoor Leaders.Journal of Experiential Education2007,Volume 30,No.2.
  • 10张玲.偏好反转研究述评[J].心理科学,1999,22(6):545-548. 被引量：7

共引文献10

同被引文献16

  • 1王重鸣.管理心理学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2001.
  • 2Slovic P. The construction of preference[J]. American Psychologist,1995,50(5) : 364-371.
  • 3Lichtenstein S, Slovic P. Reversals of Preference between bids and choice in gambling decisions[J]. Journal of Ex- perimental Psychology, 1971,89(1) :46-55.
  • 4Kahneman D,Tversky A. Prospect Theory: An Analy- sis of Decision under Risk[J]. Eeonometrica, 1979, 47(2):263- 291.
  • 5Levin I P, Gaeth G J, Schreiber J, et al. A new look at framing effects.. Distribution of effect sizes, individual differences, and independence of types of effects[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Proces- ses,2002,88(1) :411 -414.
  • 6Wong K F E, Kwong J Y. Comparing two tiny giant or two huge drafts? Preference reversals owing to number size framing[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2005 (98) : 54 - 65.
  • 7Irwin J R, Baron J. Response mode effects and moral- values[J]. Organizational Behavior and Human Deci- sion Processes,2001,84(2) :177-197.
  • 8Simon V M. Emotional Participation In Decision-Mak- ing[J]. Psychology In Spain, 1998,2 (1) : 100- 107.
  • 9Isen A M,Labroo A A. Some Ways in which Positive Af- fect Facilitates Decision Making and Judgment [M]// Schneider S L, Shanteau J. Emerging Perspectives On Judgment and Decision Research. Cambridge: Cam- bridge University Pre. ,2003:365-393.
  • 10Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases [J]. Science, 1974, 185 (4157) : 1124-1131.

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

心理与行为研究
2011年 第3期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部