期刊文献+

重庆市渝北区美沙酮维持治疗与社会心理干预项目的社会效益评价 被引量:6

Evaluation on the Social Benefits of the Project of Patients in Methadone Maintenance Treatment with Family Psychological Intervention——A Case Study of Yubei District of Chongqing Municipality
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价对美沙酮维持治疗者实施社会心理综合干预项目的社会效益。方法:对2006年9月——2010年6月重庆市渝北区美沙酮维持治疗门诊收治的吸毒患者进行综合干预。比较社会心理干预前后美沙酮维持治疗者药物滥用、违法犯罪以及社会家庭功能恢复的情况。结果:干预后过去1个月内患者注射吸毒次数从85.04次下降到10.72次;与家人关系良好率上升27.3%;没有再与吸毒朋友交往的患者比例上升了52.5%,干预后较干预前就业的患者比例上升了51.8%;违法犯罪率从干预前的2.6%下降到干预后的0.1%。结论:对美沙酮维持治疗者进行综合干预可以减少药物滥用,增加就业率,减少社会犯罪,社会效益明显。 Objective: To evaluate the social benefits of the project of patients in methadone maintenance treatment after comprehensive intervention. Methods: patients admitted to drug investigation of the September 2006-june 2010 in Chongqing Yubei methadone maintenance treatment clinics were a object group. The condition of drug abuse, the rate of crime and the efficacy of recovery of social functions of the group were compared before and after intervention. Results: The frequency of in jesting drug declined from 85.04 to 10.72 in last month after comprehensive intervention. The rate of patients feel a good relationship with his family has increased 27.3%.The number of patients did not have interaction with friends of drug has increased 52.5%. The rate of patients have gotten a job in last month has increased 51.8%. The rate of crime declined from 2.6% to 0.1%. Conclusion: Methadone maintenance treatment combining with comprehensive intervention can reduce the risk behaviors among drug users, improve the function of family and society, and decrease the crime rate. The social benefits are significantly.
作者 陈菲 胡伟
出处 《医学与社会》 2011年第9期78-80,共3页 Medicine and Society
基金 2010年重庆市教委人文社科项目研究成果之一 项目编号为10SKD05
关键词 综合干预 美沙酮维持治疗 社会效益 评价 Comprehensive intervention Methadone maintenance treatment The social benefits Evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献18

  • 1郑继旺.十年回顾.中国药物依赖性杂志,2002,11(1):1-1.
  • 2Bertozzi,et al.chapter 18:hiv/aids prevention and treatment,in disease control priorities in developing countries,d.jamison,et al,editors.2006,oxford university press:New York.
  • 3Beyrer c.Hidden epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases in china:crisis and opporturity[J].jama,2003.289(10):1303-5.
  • 4Ministry of health of china,national hiv/sti surveillance report.2004.
  • 5Ksobiech,k.A meta-analysis of needle sharing,lending and borrowing behaviors of needle exchange program attenders[J].aids educ prev,2003,15(3):257-68.
  • 6Kahn J.Chapter 14:how do neps affect hiv drug and sex risk behaviors?the public health impact of needle exchange programs in the united states and abroad[R].in report prepared for the centers for disease control and prevention.1993:san francisco.
  • 7Lurie,P.,E.Darker,A knowles still working after all these years:increasing evidence of needle exchange program (nep) effectiveness in studies published since 1993.in xii international aids conference.1998.geneva.
  • 8Gowing L,et al.Substitution treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of hiv infection[M].in cochrane database syst rev,.2004.
  • 9Gowing L R,et al.Brief report:methadone treatment of injecting opioid users for prevention of hiv infection[J].j gen intern med,2006.21(2):193-5.
  • 10Marshall N,et al.The effectiveness of hiv prevention interventions in developing and transitional countries:a systematic review.under review,2006.

共引文献33

同被引文献68

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部