期刊文献+

专业化和手术负荷对结直肠癌手术质量的影响 被引量:2

原文传递
导出
摘要 目前国内外学者常通过医生专业化程度、医生手术负荷量以及医院手术容量3个较为主观的指标来评价医生与医院因素对结直肠癌患者手术效果和生存预后的影响程度。这从医生和医院的角度为结直肠癌手术质量评估体系增添了新的内容,对医学生和年轻医生的培养提供了专业技能训练的指导。现就医生的专业化程度和负荷量、医院手术容量在结直肠癌手术中所起作用的研究近况进行综述。
出处 《华西医学》 CAS 2011年第8期1259-1263,共5页 West China Medical Journal
  • 相关文献

参考文献53

  • 1李立,汪晓东,舒晔,于永扬,王存,王自强,王天才,周总光.四川大学华西医院·结直肠癌手术治疗指南(一)[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(10):778-778. 被引量:26
  • 2汪晓东,曹霖,吕东昊,邱萌,李立.多学科协作诊治模式下结直肠癌新辅助化疗联合手术的风险评估研究[J].中国普外基础与临床杂志,2008,15(9):692-696. 被引量:5
  • 3周岩冰,江海涛,周晓斌,张建立,王海波,毛伟征,丁连安,张敬智,于冠君.直肠癌手术的质量控制[J].青岛大学医学院学报,2006,42(2):95-98. 被引量:6
  • 4Cameron Platell,Daniel Lim,Nazreen Tajudeen,Karen Wong.Dose surgical sub-specialization influence survival in patients with colorectal cancer?[J].World Journal of Gastroenterology,2003,9(5):961-964. 被引量:4
  • 5Emmeline Nugent,Paul Neary.Rectal cancer surgery: volume–outcome analysis[J]. International Journal of Colorectal Disease . 2010 (12)
  • 6Harriett Purves M.P.H.,Ricardo Pietrobon M.D., Ph.D.,Sheleika Hervey M.D.,Ulrich Guller M.D., M.H.S.,William Miller M.D., Ph.D.,Kirk Ludwig M.D..Relationship Between Surgeon Caseload and Sphincter Preservation in Patients With Rectal Cancer[J]. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum . 2005 (2)
  • 7Basili G,,Lorenzetti L,Biondi G,et al.Colorectal cancer in theelderly.Is there a role for safe and curative surgery. RoyAustralas Colle Surg . 2008
  • 8Andrén-Sandberg A,Neoptoloemos JP.Resection for pancreaticcancer in the new millennium. Pancreatology . 2002
  • 9Anwar S,Fraser S,Hill J.Surgical specialization and training-its relation to clinical outcome for colorectal cancer surgery. JEval Clin Pract . 2010
  • 10Hall BL,Hsiao EY,Majercik S,et al.The impact of surgeonspecialization on patient mortality examination of a continuousherfindahl-hirschman index. Annals of Surgery . 2009

二级参考文献31

  • 1[1]Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC. Surgeon related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998; 227:157-167
  • 2[2]Khuri SF, Daley J, Henderson W, Hur K, Hossain M, Saybel D,Kizer KW, Aust JB, Bell RH, Chang V, Demakis J, Faleri PJ, Gibbs JO, Graver F, Hammermeister K, McDonald G, Passaro E, Phillips L, Scamman F, Spencer J, Stremple JF. Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations. Results from the VA national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg 1999; 230:414-432
  • 3[3]Singh KK, Barry MK, Ralston P, Henderson MA, McCormick JS,Walls AD, Auld CD. Audit of colorectal cancer surgery by nonspecialist surgeons. Br J Surg 1997;84:343-347
  • 4[4]NHMRC. Guidelines for the prevention, early detection and management of colorectal cancer. 1999
  • 5[5]Platell C. A community-based hospital experience with colorectal cancer. Aust NZ J Surg 1997; 67:420-423
  • 6[6]Sainsbury R, Haward B, Rider L, Johnston C, Round C. Influence of clinician workload and patterns of treatment on survival from breast cancer. Lancet 1995; 345:1265-1270
  • 7[7]Matthews HR, Powell DJ, McConkey CC. Effects of the result of surgical experience on the results of resection for oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg 1986; 73:621-623
  • 8[8]McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. Br Med J 1991;302:1501-1505
  • 9[9]Committee on Quality of Health Care in America and the National Cancer Policy Board. Interpreting the volume-outcome relationship in the context of health care quality. Washington: Institute of Medicine 2000
  • 10[10]Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer BS. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: Potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery 2001;130:415-422

共引文献35

同被引文献14

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部