期刊文献+

新辅助化疗后腋窝阳性淋巴结病理完全缓解对乳腺癌预后的影响 被引量:11

Impact of response of positive axillary nodes to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast cancer survival
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较腋窝淋巴结病理完全缓解(pCR)与腋窝淋巴结癌残留乳腺癌患者的生存差异。方法回顾性分析376例接受新辅助化疗的腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌患者的临床与病理资料。结果中位随访时间24个月(5~100个月),腋窝淋巴结pCR率30.9%(116/376)。腋窝淋巴结pCR与残留患者的3年无远位转移生存(DDFS)率分别为91.7%与78.8%,生存曲线比较差异有统计学意义(Log-rank检验P=0.016)。多因素分析显示残留患者DDFS风险是pCR患者的2.14倍(P=0.047);两组无病生存(DFS)曲线比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。残留组中淋巴结转移数≤3枚与≥4枚患者的DDFS生存曲线比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。结论腋窝淋巴结阳性乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的腋窝淋巴结状态与无远位转移生存相关。 Objective To compare the distant disease-free survival between breast cancer patients with nodal pathological complete response (pCR) and those with nodal residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods The clinical and pathological data of 376 needle biopsy proved node positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy were retrospectively analyzed. Results The median follow-up time was 24 months (range: 5 - 100). The pCR rate of axillary lymph node was 30.9%. And the three-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) rates were 91.7% and 78. 8% in the patients with axillary lymph node pCR and RD respectively. According to the Log-rank test, there were significant differences in survival curves (P =0. 016). Multivariate analysis showed that the relative risk of DDFS for patients with RD was 2. 14 folds of than that of the pCR group ( P = O. 047 ). No significant difference existed between the disease-free survival (DFS) curve in two groups. DDFS had significant differences between the patients with the number of lymph node metastasis ~〈 3 and I〉 4 in the RD group (P = 0. 001 ). Conclusion The distant disease-free survival of node positive breast cancer is associated with the status of axillary lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
出处 《中华医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第30期2116-2119,共4页 National Medical Journal of China
关键词 乳腺肿瘤 淋巴结 新辅助化疗 无远位转移生存 Breast neoplasms Lymph node Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Distant disease-free survival
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Fisher B , Bryant J , Wolmark N , et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol , 1998 , 16:2672-2685.
  • 2Fisher ER, Wang J , Bryant J , et al . Pathobiology of preoperative chemotherapy : Findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel (NSABP) protocol B-18. Cancer , 2002 ,95:681-695.
  • 3Kuerer HM, Newan LA, Smith TL, et al. Clinical course of breast cancer patients with complete pathologic primary tumor and axillary lymph node response to doxorubicin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol, 1999, 17:460-469.
  • 4Scholl SM, Pierga JY, Asselain B, et al. Breast tumour response to primary chemotherapy predicts local and distant control as well as survival. Eur J Cancer, 1995,31A:1969-1975.
  • 5Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E, et al. Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr, 2001,30:96-100.
  • 6Fisher B, Brown A, Mamounas E, et al. Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: Findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18. J Clin Oncol, 1997, 15:2483-2493.
  • 7Recht A, Houlihan MJ. Axillary lymph nodes and breast cancer. Cancer, 1995, 76 : 1491-1512.
  • 8欧阳涛,李金锋,范照青,范铁,王天峰,解云涛,林本耀.原发性乳腺癌超声影像异常腋窝淋巴结穿刺病理学检查的临床应用[J].中华医学杂志,2008,88(2):82-84. 被引量:13
  • 9Rouzier R , Extra JM, Klijanienko J , et al . Incidence and prognostic significance of complete axiUary downstaging after primary chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with T1 to T3 tumors and cytologically proven axillary metastatic lymph nodes. J Clin Oncol .2002 .20 ,1304-1310.
  • 10Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol,2005,23:9304-9311.

二级参考文献14

  • 1李金锋,欧阳涛,王雪鹃,王天峰,解云涛,范照清,林宝和,杨志,林本耀.新型示踪剂^(99m)Tc-利妥昔用于原发性乳腺癌前哨淋巴结活检的初步研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(9):600-602. 被引量:13
  • 2Sacre RA. Clinical evaluation of axillary lymph nodes compared to surgical and pathological findings. Eur J Surg Oncol , 1986,12: 169-173.
  • 3Bonnema J, VanGeel AN, Ooijen BV, et al. Ultrasound guided aspiration biopsy for detection of nonpalpable axillary node metastases in breast cancer patients: new diagnostic method. World J Surg, 1997, 21:270-274.
  • 4Deurloo EE, Tanis PJ, Gilhuijs KG, et al. Reduction in the number of sentinel lymph node procedures by preoperative ultrasonography of the axilla in breast cancer. Eur J Cancer, 2003, 39 : 1068-1073.
  • 5Hennessy BT, Hortobagyi GN, Rouzier R, et al. Outcome after pathologic complete eradication of cytologically proven breast cancer axillary node metastases following primary chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol,2005, 23:9304-9311.
  • 6Singletary SE, Allred C, Ashley P, et al. Revision of the American joint committee on cancer staging system for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2002,20:3628-3636.
  • 7Goldhirsch A, Wood W, Gelber R, et al . Meeting highlights: updated international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol, 2003,21 : 3357-3365.
  • 8Goldhirsch A, Glick JH, Gelber RD, et al. Meeting highlights: international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2005 . Ann Oncol, 2005, 16:1569-1583.
  • 9Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfield MR, et al. American society of clinical oncology guideline recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol ,2005,23 : 7703 -7720.
  • 10Kuenen-Boumeester V, Menke-Pluymers M, de Kanter AY, et al. Ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients. A preoperative staging procedure. Eur J Cancer, 2003, 39 : 170-174.

共引文献12

同被引文献115

  • 1Hai-feng Song,Xiu-wen Liu,Hai-ning Zhang,Bao-zhen Zhu,Shou-jun Yuan,Shang-yi Liu,Zhong-ming Tang.Pharmacokinetics of His-tag recombinant human endostatin in Rhesus monkeys[J].Acta Pharmacologica Sinica,2005,26(1):124-128. 被引量:16
  • 2王金万,孙燕,刘永煜,于起涛,张沂平,李凯,朱允中,周清华,侯梅,管忠震,李维廉,庄武,王东林,梁后杰,秦凤展,卢辉山,刘晓晴,孙红,张燕军,王杰军,罗素霞,杨瑞合,涂远荣,王秀问,宋恕平,周静敏,游丽芬,王竞,姚晨.重组人血管内皮抑素联合NP方案治疗晚期NSCLC随机、双盲、对照、多中心Ⅲ期临床研究[J].中国肺癌杂志,2005,8(4):283-290. 被引量:625
  • 3Kaklamani VG, Xu BH, Gomez HL, et al. Global experience with ixabepilone in breast cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2011, 11:683-692 .
  • 4Bachelot T, Bourgier C, Cropet C, et al. TAMRAD: a GINECO randomized phase Ⅱ trim of everolimus in combination with tamoxifen versus tamoxifen alone in patients (pts) with hormone- receptor positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) with prior exposure to aromatase inhibitors (AI) . Presented at the 33rd Annual San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, TX, December 8-12, 2010.
  • 5Mauriac L, Romieu G, Bines J. Activity of fulvestram versus exemestane in advanced breast cancer patients with or without visceral metastases : data from the EFECT trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2009, 117 : 69-75.
  • 6Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med,2011,365:610-615.
  • 7Osborne CK. Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med,1998, 339: 1609-1618.
  • 8Rachel S, Suleiman M, Jiang S, et al. Breast cancer endocrine resistance: how growth factor signaling and estrogen receptor coregulators modulate response. Clin Cancer Res, 2003,9: 447S- 454S.
  • 9Hiscox S, Bamfather P, Hayes E, et al. Johnston S. Inhibition of focal adhesion kinase suppresses the adverse phenotype of endocrine-resistant breast cancer cells and improves endocrine response in endocrine-sensitive ceils. Breast Cancer Res Treat , 2011,125:659-669.
  • 10Schiff R, Massarweh S, Shou J, et al. Cross-talk between estrogen receptor and growth factor pathways as a molecular target for overcoming endocrine resistance. Clin Cancer Res, 2004, 10: 331S-336S.

引证文献11

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部