3Luongo G, Oteri G. A noninterventional study docu- menting use and success of implants with a new chemically modified titanium surface in daily dental practice [J] .Oral Implantol. 2010,36 (4) :305-14.
4Kim SH, Kang SM, Choi IS et al. Cone-beam com- puted tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? [J] . Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010,138 (3) :264-76.
6Ahn S J, Leesungbok R, Lee SW. Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter im- plants with alternative surface treatments and differ- ent designs [J] . Oral Implantol. 2010,36 (4) :263- 72.
8Sung S J, Jang GW, Chun YS et al. Effective en- masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-im- plant anchorage: a finite element analysis [J] .Or- thod Dentofaeial Orthop. 2010, 137 (5) :648-57.
9Bardyn T, Gedet P, Hallermann W, et al. Prediction of dental implant torque with a fast and automatic finite element analysis: a pilot study [J] . Oral Max- illofac Implants. 2009,24 (5) :877-86.
