期刊文献+

儒家文质观与其人性论的内在关联 被引量:3

On the Intrinsic Connection between Confucian Theory of Human Nature and View on Style and Content
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美学界对儒家文质观的研究都基本上忽略了其与儒家人性论的关系,并认为儒家都主张文质彬彬,从而又忽略了孔子、孟子和荀子的文质观的差别。究其实,孟子主张性善,所以他重质不重文,主张先质后文、要以质救文;荀子认为性恶,所以他重文不重质,注重以文灭质;性善论和性恶论的因素在孔子的思想中都具有,所以他主张文质彬彬,既主张先质后文,又主张以文救质。 The studies of Confucian view on style and content in the aesthetic circle have almost all neglected its relation with the theory of human nature and hold that Confueians pursue equal half of style and content. However, these studies over- look the difference of views on style and content among Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi. Originally, Mencius held the good na- ture theory, so he emphasized content instead of style. He thought that content should be superior to style and we should save style with content. Xunzi insisted in the evil nature theory, so he stressed style in stead of content. The factors of both good nature theory and evil nature theory can be seen in Confucian thoughts. So he held the equal half of style and content. And ac- cording to him, content could be superior to style and it could also be polished with style.
作者 邓军海
出处 《内江师范学院学报》 2011年第9期17-22,共6页 Journal of Neijiang Normal University
基金 天津师范大学博士基金项目"中国古典美学研究思路之反思"(52WN98)
关键词 儒家美学 文质观 人性论 Confucian aesthetics view on style and content theory of human nature
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[美]J·刘若愚中国的文学理论[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1986.13.
  • 2[美]赫伯特·芬格莱特,彭国翔,张华译.即凡而圣[M].南京:江苏人民出版社,2002.3-4.
  • 3邓军海.文质争论所争何事[G]//中国诗歌研究(第5辑).北京:中华书局,2008.
  • 4傅佩荣.浅谈儒家的充实之美[M]//儒家与现代人生.台北:业强出版社,1989.
  • 5王壁如.中国哲学概论[M].台北:正中书局,1960.
  • 6韦政通.中国思想史(上)[M].台北:水牛出版社,1986.
  • 7郑也夫.中庸之道的现代回声[J].读书,1994,0(1):23-28. 被引量:6
  • 8GordonGraham. Philosophy of the Arts : An Introduc- tion to Aaesthetics, Londonand New York, Routledge, 1997, P. 2.

共引文献8

同被引文献19

引证文献3

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部