期刊文献+

阴道炎五联检测试剂盒临床诊断价值探讨 被引量:2

Clinical Value of Quintuple Kit for the Diagnosis of Vaginitis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 【目的】探讨LTS-V400阴道炎检测仪五联试剂在细菌性阴道病(BV)诊断中的临床价值。【方法]248例妇科门诊患者阴道分泌物同时用手工Amsel法、革兰染色和瑞氏染色及阴道炎五联试剂进行检测,并对其结果一致性进行对比分析。【结果]248例样本中,手工Amsel阳性率为21.0%,五联检测法阳性率为21.4%,两者比较差异无统计学意义(r=0.08,P〉0.05)。以Amsel法为诊断BV的参照方法,则联合检法诊断BV的灵敏性为88.5%(46/62),特异性为96.4%(189/196),假阴性率为3.1%(6/196),假阳性率为13.5%(7/52)。两种检测方法的一致性评价,k=0.95,具有高度的一致性。五联检测法的β-氨基半乳糖苷酶阳性病例为55例,阳性率为22.2%(55/248),革兰和瑞氏染色检测霉菌或滴虫感染的阳性病例为58例,阳性率为23.4%(58/248),两者比较差异无统计学意义(x^2=0.06,P〉0.05)。【结论】检测仪五联检测法适用于临床快速、准确诊断细菌、真菌、滴虫等类阴道炎检查,可作为诊断的一种常规方法在临床中推广应用。 [Objective] To explore the clinical value of quintuple kit of LTS-V400 instrument for vaginitis detection in the diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis(BV). [Methods] The vaginal secretions of 248 gynecologic outpatients were simultaneously detected by manual Amsel method, Gram and Wright's staining and quintuple kit. The consistency of the results was compared. [Results] Among 248 samples, the positive rate of manual Amsel method and quintuple kit was 21.0% and 21.4%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (X^2 = 0.08, P 〉0.05). With Amsel method as the reference for the diagnosis of BV, the sensitivity, specificity, false negative rate and false positive rate of the combination method was 88. 5% (46/52), 96. 4% (189/196), 3.1%(6/196) and 13. 5%(7/52), respectively. The consistency evaluation showed that two methods had high consistency(k=0.95). The positive rate of β-amino-galactosidase by quintuple kit and Gram and Wright's staining was 22.2 % (55/248) and 23.4% (58/248), respectively, but there was no significant difference between them(x^2=0.06, P 〉0. 05). [Conclusion]Quintuple kit is suitable for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of bacterial, fungal and trichomonas vaginitis, so it can be a routine diagnostic method to be generalized in the clinical application.
机构地区 湖南省人民医院
出处 《医学临床研究》 CAS 2011年第8期1496-1498,共3页 Journal of Clinical Research
关键词 阴道炎 试剂金 诊断 vaginitis reagent kits,diagnostic
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献16

共引文献69

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部