期刊文献+

联合靶控输注丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼诱导儿童无肌松气管插管 被引量:7

Induction of Tracheal Intubation without Muscle Relaxant by Target-controlled Infusion of Propofol Combined with Remifentanil in Children
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨丙泊酚和瑞芬太尼联合靶控输注用于儿童无肌松气管插管的有效性和安全性。方法将100例4~10岁、ASAⅠ级行择期整形外科手术的儿童按照计算机随机分组的方法分为瑞芬太尼组和对照组,每组50例。静脉注射0.01 mg/kg阿托品和0.1 mg/kg咪达唑仑5 min后,靶控输注丙泊酚,丙泊酚的效应室浓度为6μg/ml。待效应室药物浓度达到平衡后,给瑞芬太尼组患儿靶控输注瑞芬太尼的同时静脉注射生理盐水0.1 ml/kg,瑞芬太尼的效应室浓度为5 ng/ml;给对照组患儿靶控输注生理盐水的同时静脉注射罗库溴铵0.8 mg/kg。待瑞芬太尼效应室浓度达到平衡后行气管插管。根据下颌松弛度、置入喉镜容易度、声带位置、咳嗽程度及体动5个方面进行气管插管条件评分。结果瑞芬太尼组和对照组的插管成功率分别为90%和98%。两组气管插管条件评分的差异无统计学意义(P=0.122)。结论联合靶控输注效应室浓度6μg/ml的丙泊酚和效应室浓度5 ng/ml的瑞芬太尼能成功诱导儿童无肌松气管插管。 Objective To observe the safety and feasibility of tracheal intubation by target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil without muscle relaxant in children.Methods Totally 100 4-10-year-old pediatric patients(ASAⅠ) who had been scheduled for plastic surgery were equally divided into remifentanil group and control group through computer-generated randomized grouping.In all patients,five minutes after intravenous administration of atropine 0.01 mg/kg and midazolam 0.1 mg/kg,propofol was infused at the targeted effect-site concentration(Ce)of 6 μg/ml.When the intended target Ce of propofol was reached,the remifentanil group began to be infused with remifentanil at a Ce of 5 ng/ml,and normal saline(0.1 ml/kg) was injected simultaneously.In the control group,remifentanil was replaced by normal saline,and rocuronium(0.8 mg/kg) was injected together with the normal saline.After the equilibration of plasma and the Ce of remifentanil were reached,tracheal intubation was attempted.The complications during the induction and tracheal intubation were recorded.The intubating conditions were assessed using a five-point scoring system based on ease of laryngoscopy,vocal cords position,coughing,jaw relaxation and limb movement.Results The success rate of tracheal intubation was in 90% in remifentanil group and 98% in the control group(P=0.122).Conclusion Target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil at Ce of 6 μg/ml and 5 ng/ml is feasible for the induction and tracheal intubation without muscle relaxant in children.
出处 《中国医学科学院学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2011年第4期440-444,共5页 Acta Academiae Medicinae Sinicae
关键词 丙泊酚 瑞芬太尼 儿童 靶控输注 propofol remifentanil children target-controlled infusion
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1魏灵欣,邓晓明,刘具会,佟世义,刘建华,唐耿志,罗茂萍,胥琨琳.无肌松药条件下丙泊酚联合不同剂量雷米芬太尼用于小儿气管插管[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2008,24(9):748-749. 被引量:14
  • 2Morgan JM, Barker I, Peacock JE, et al. A comparison of intubating conditions in children following indution of anaesthesia with propofol and suxamethonium or propofol and remifentanil [J]. Anaesthesia, 2007, 62(2):135-139.
  • 3Crawford MW, Hayes J, Tan JM. Dose-response of remifentanil for tracheal intubation in infants [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2005, 100(6) :1599-1604.
  • 4Gupta A, Kaur R, Malhotra R, et al. Comparative evaluation of different dose of propofol preceded by fentanyl on intubating conditions and pressor response during tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth,2006, 16(4):399-405.
  • 5Batra YK, Alqattan AR, Ali SS, et al. Assessment of tracheal intubating conditions in children using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxant [ J ]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2004, 14(6) :452-456.
  • 6Marsh B, White M, Morton N, et al. Pharmacokinetic model driven infusion of propofol in children [ J ]. Br J Anaesth, 1991, 67(1) :41-48.
  • 7Minto CF, Schnider TW, Egan TD, et al. Influence of age and gender on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. I. Model development [ J ]. Anesthesiology, 1997, 86(1) :10-23.
  • 8Viby-Mogensen J, Engbaek J, Eriksson LI. et al. Good clinical research practice (GCRP) in pharmacodynamic studies of neuromuscular blocking agents [J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 1996, 40(1) :59-74.
  • 9De Castro V, Goder G, Mencia G, et al. Target-controlled infusion for remifentanil in vascular patients improves hemodynamics and decreases remifentanil requirement [ J ]. Anesth Analg, 2003, 96(1) :33-38.
  • 10Davis PJ, Ross A, Stiller RL, et al. Pharmacokinetics of remifentanil in anesthetized children 2-12 years of age [ J]. Anesth Analg, 1995, 80(6) :S93.

二级参考文献12

  • 1Trabold F,Casetta J,Duranteau P,et al.Propofol and remifentanil for intubation without muscle relaxant:the effect of the order of injection.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand,2004,48:35-39.
  • 2Erhan E,Ugur G,Gunusen I,et al.Propofol-not thiopental or etomidate-with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockade.Can J Anaesth,2003,50:108-115.
  • 3Grant S,Noble S,Woods J,et al.Assessment of intubating conditions in adults after induction with propofol and varying doses of remifentanil.Br J Anaesth,1998,81:540-543.
  • 4Davidson JA,Gillespie JA.Tracheal intubation after induction of anaesthesia with propofol,alfentanil and i.v.lignocaine.Br J Anaesth,1993,70:163-166.
  • 5Stevens JB,Wheatley L.Tracheal intubation in ambulatory surgery patients:using remifentanil and propofol without muscle relaxants.Anesth Analg,1998,86:45-49.
  • 6Sanford TJ,Weinger MB,Smith NT,et al.Pretreatment with sedativehypnotics but not with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants,attenuates alfentanil induced muscle rigidity.J Clin Anesth,1994,6:473-480.
  • 7Thompson JP,Hall AP,Russell J,et al.Effect of remifentanil on the haemodynamic response to orotracheal intubation.Br J Anaesth,1998,80:467 -469.
  • 8Barclay K,Kluger MT.Effect of bolus dose of remifentanil on haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation.Anesth Intensive Care,2000,28:403-407.
  • 9Steyn MP, Quinn AM, Gillespie JA, et al. Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children. Br J Anaesth, 1994,72 : 403-406.
  • 10Klemola UM, Mennander S, Saarnivaara L. Tracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxant: remifentanil or alfentanil in combination with propolol. Aeta Anaesthesiol Seand, 2000, 44: 465-469.

共引文献34

同被引文献85

  • 1高秀江,张志辉,毛瑞芬,周长浩,王莉,杨艳超.瑞芬太尼与芬太尼对腹部手术患者全麻诱导期血液动力学的影响[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(2):149-150. 被引量:85
  • 2Steyn MP, Quinn AM, Gillespie JA, et al. Tracheal intubation without neuromuscular block in children. Br J Anaesth, 1994,72 : 403 406.
  • 3Cole JW, Murray DJ, McAllister JD, et al. Emergence behaviour in children: defining the incidence of excitement and agitation following anaesthesia. Paediatr Anaesth, 2002,12:442447.
  • 4Politis GD, Frankland M J, James RL, et al. Factors associated with successful tracheal intubation of children with sevoilurane and no muscle relaxant. Anesth Analg, 2002,95:615-620.
  • 5Kwak FIJ, Kim JY, Min SK, et al. Optimal bolus dose of alfentauil for successful tracheal intubation during sevoflurane induction with and without nitrous oxide in children. Br J Anaesth, 2010,104:628-632.
  • 6Park KS, Park SY, Kim JY, et al. Effect of remifentanil on tracheal intubation conditions and haemodynamics in children anaesthetised with sevoflurane and nitrous oxide. Anaesth Intensive Care, 2009,37:577-583.
  • 7Siddik-Sayyid SM, Taha SK, Aouad MT, et al. Propofol 2 mg/kg is superior to propofol 1 mg/kg for tracheal intubation in children during sevoflurane induction. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2011,55 : 535-538.
  • 8Aouad MT, Yazbeck-Karam VG, Mallat CE, et al. The effect of adjuvant drugs on the quality of tracheal intubation without muscle relaxants in children: a systematic review of randomized trials. Paediatr Anaesth, 2012,22:6164526.
  • 9Oberer C, yon Ungern-Sternberg BS, Frei FJ, et al. Respiratory reflex responses of the larynx differ between sevoflurane and propofol in pediatric patients. Anesthesiology, 2005,103: 1142- 1148.
  • 10Gore MS, Harnagale KD. Evaluation of lntubating Conditions with Varying Doses of Propofol without Muscle Relaxants. J Anaesthesiol Chn Pharmacol, 20 l 1,27 : 27-30.

引证文献7

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部